[EURO-Discuss] Things to discuss

[Nick Ashton-Hart]

Could not both be combined - asking if people are interested in  
working on one of the working groups and letting them select from  
them (as many as they like) - but then also providing 3 opportunities  
for respondents to fill in if they are interested in other areas of  
work, and tell a bit about why those interest them?

Otherwise those taking the survey will not even know what areas are  
already being worked on which they might be interested in - and where  
input is (in some cases urgently) needed.

On 8 Jul 2007, at 13:58, Wolf Ludwig wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> If I didn’t miss something, the following ICANN-related topics were  
> suggested so far:
> ->Protection of Registrants in relation to Registrars (RAA amendments)
> ->IPv6
> ->IDNs
> ->DNSSEC
> ->gTLD process
> ->ICANN Geographic Regions (a joint interest with the ccNSO)
>
> ->Privacy and Whois
> ->Price development in the registration sphere
> ->DNS and Freedom of expression.
> ->ICANN reform, and the GNSO reform recommendations re constituency  
> restructuring
> ->public sphere and concerns.
>
> In the suggested survey (by Vittorio) among ALSes I think it would  
> be better not
> to mention these issues already (and to offer a kind of multiple  
> choice) but to leave
> it up to the ALSes to tell their 3 main concerns and priorities.
>
> Such a survey could be done in the following format and comprise  
> questions like:
>
> Organisation / ALS:
>
> Representative / contact point:
>
> What should be, according to your organizational targets, the main  
> issues and priorities for an EURALO working programme 2007-08?
> 1.
> 2.
> 3.
>
> Please give a short explanation why these issues are of prior  
> relevance for your organisation.
>
> Would you (representative/contact point) or another person of your  
> organisation like to contribute to EURALO’s work in respect to your  
> suggested priorities?
>
> What do you suggest or expect EURALO should concentrate on in the  
> next two years under assumed limited capacities?
>
> Best,
> Wolf
>
>
> Kleinwächter, Wolfgang wrote Sun, 08 Jul 2007 14:21:
>>
>> Vittorio:  2 Work plan
>> We could specifically ask all ALSes to suggest the three most  
>> important ICANN-related issues that they see, for example. Also,  
>> some of us should participate in the ALAC working groups on  
>> various issues, that are going to start working soon.
>>
>> Wolfgang:
>>
>> Vittorio, this is a good proposal I support this.
>>
>>
>>
>> Vittorio:
>>
>>> ** We could meet in Geneva on the first weekend in September  
>>> preceding > the next open consultation of the IGF.
>>> ** We could meet in mid October in Warsaw at Wolfgang's >  
>>> Studienkreismeeting (Oct. 10/11).>
>>
>> Wolfgang:
>> As said in an earlier mail this is an offer. Formally the EURALO  
>> Board has to make a decision and, if it comes to funding,  
>> formulate a request to Nick. Nick told me that no request has  
>> arrived so far and his argument was, that EURALO had already its  
>> regional funding in Lisbon. I told him that in Lisbon, there was  
>> no EURALO Board and it would be useful for the Board members, to  
>> have at least one F2F meeting before LA.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> EURO-Discuss mailing list
>> EURO-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro- 
>> discuss_atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>
>> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org
>>
>
> comunica-ch
> phone +41 79 204 83 87
> www.comunica-ch.net
>
> http://blog.allmend.ch -
> Digitale Allmend
>
> _______________________________________________
> EURO-Discuss mailing list
> EURO-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro- 
> discuss_atlarge-lists.icann.org
>
> Homepage for the region: http://www.euralo.org