<html>
  <head>

    <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    FYI - finalised version sent directly, plus contributed to the CPWG
    ALAC process.<br>
    <div class="moz-forward-container"><br>
      <br>
      -------- Forwarded Message --------
      <table class="moz-email-headers-table" cellspacing="0"
        cellpadding="0" border="0">
        <tbody>
          <tr>
            <th valign="BASELINE" nowrap="nowrap" align="RIGHT">Subject:
            </th>
            <td>Fwd: NomCom Review: Feedback on planned implementation
              steps</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <th valign="BASELINE" nowrap="nowrap" align="RIGHT">Date: </th>
            <td>Tue, 11 Jun 2019 15:59:08 +0200</td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <th valign="BASELINE" nowrap="nowrap" align="RIGHT">From: </th>
            <td>Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:ocl@gih.com"><ocl@gih.com></a></td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <th valign="BASELINE" nowrap="nowrap" align="RIGHT">To: </th>
            <td>Maureen Hilyard <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:maureen.hilyard@gmail.com"><maureen.hilyard@gmail.com></a>,
              Justine Chew <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:justine.chew@gmail.com"><justine.chew@gmail.com></a></td>
          </tr>
          <tr>
            <th valign="BASELINE" nowrap="nowrap" align="RIGHT">CC: </th>
            <td><a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:cpwg@icann.org">cpwg@icann.org</a> <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:cpwg@icann.org"><cpwg@icann.org></a></td>
          </tr>
        </tbody>
      </table>
      <br>
      <br>
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      Dear Maureen and Justine,<br>
      <br>
      I am writing to you to let you know of EURALO's response to the
      questions asked. We were contacted directly by NomCom Review
      staff. Having reviewed the ALAC's proposed response, I note that
      our answers are broadly aligned.<br>
      Kindest regards,<br>
      <br>
      Olivier<br>
      <div class="moz-forward-container"><br>
        <br>
        -------- Forwarded Message --------
        <table class="moz-email-headers-table" cellspacing="0"
          cellpadding="0" border="0">
          <tbody>
            <tr>
              <th valign="BASELINE" nowrap="nowrap" align="RIGHT">Subject:
              </th>
              <td>Re: NomCom Review: Feedback on planned implementation
                steps</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <th valign="BASELINE" nowrap="nowrap" align="RIGHT">Date:
              </th>
              <td>Tue, 11 Jun 2019 15:48:10 +0200</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <th valign="BASELINE" nowrap="nowrap" align="RIGHT">From:
              </th>
              <td>Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond <a
                  class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
                  href="mailto:ocl@gih.com" moz-do-not-send="true"><ocl@gih.com></a></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <th valign="BASELINE" nowrap="nowrap" align="RIGHT">To: </th>
              <td>Jean-Baptiste Deroulez <a
                  class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
                  href="mailto:jean-baptiste.deroulez@icann.org"
                  moz-do-not-send="true"><jean-baptiste.deroulez@icann.org></a></td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
              <th valign="BASELINE" nowrap="nowrap" align="RIGHT">CC: </th>
              <td>Tom Barrett <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
                  href="mailto:tbarrett@encirca.com"
                  moz-do-not-send="true"><tbarrett@encirca.com></a>,
                Cheryl Langdon-Orr <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
                  href="mailto:langdonorr@gmail.com"
                  moz-do-not-send="true"><langdonorr@gmail.com></a>,
                Zahid Jamil-IG (<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
                  href="mailto:internet@jamilandjamil.com"
                  moz-do-not-send="true">internet@jamilandjamil.com</a>)
                <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
                  href="mailto:internet@jamilandjamil.com"
                  moz-do-not-send="true"><internet@jamilandjamil.com></a>,
                Lars Hoffmann <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
                  href="mailto:lars.hoffmann@icann.org"
                  moz-do-not-send="true"><lars.hoffmann@icann.org></a>,
                ICANN At-Large Staff <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E"
                  href="mailto:staff@atlarge.icann.org"
                  moz-do-not-send="true"><staff@atlarge.icann.org></a></td>
            </tr>
          </tbody>
        </table>
        <br>
        <br>
        <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
          charset=UTF-8">
        <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Dear Jean-Baptiste,<br>
          <br>
          thank you for reaching out to EURALO. Please be so kind to
          find the EURALO input to this consultation with responses
          interspersed in your text below, written in <font
            color="#3366ff">BLUE</font>. <br>
          This input is not meant to contradict the ALAC input on the
          matter, as EURALO will support the ALAC's input. Although this
          input was prepared independently of the ALAC's input, it
          should be taken as complementary to the ALAC's advice.<br>
          If you have any question about any part of EURALO's response,
          please do not hesitate to contact me.<br>
          Kindest regards,<br>
          <br>
          Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond<br>
          EURALO Chair<br>
          <br>
          <br>
          On 14/05/2019 16:51, Jean-Baptiste Deroulez wrote:<br>
        </div>
        <blockquote type="cite"
          cite="mid:7ECF19C2-0BA0-4F73-A7B5-E9351BACF7F8@icann.org">
          <div class="WordSection1">
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Dear
                Olivier, </span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">We are
                contacting you in the capacity of Chair and Vice-Chairs
                of the NomCom Review Implementation Working Group
                (NomComRIWG). Following the ICANN </span><a
href="https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2019-03-14-en#2.f"
                moz-do-not-send="true"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Board’s
                  acceptance</span></a><span style="font-size:11.0pt">
                of the </span><a
href="https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/nomcom-review-final-05jun18-en.pdf"
                moz-do-not-send="true"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Final
                  Report</span></a><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> and
                the </span><a
href="https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/nomcom2-ipt-review-faiip-14dec18-en.pdf"
                moz-do-not-send="true"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Feasibility
                  Assessment and Initial Implementation Plan</span></a><span
                style="font-size:11.0pt">, we have been tasked to
                oversee the implementation of the twenty-seven (27)
                recommendations issued by the independent examiner.</span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Before
                implementation can begin, the Board has asked us to
                draft a Detailed Implementation Plan, due to be
                submitted to the Board’s Organizational Effectiveness
                Committee no later than 14 September 2019. </span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">While
                the NomComRIWG has the Board-mandated responsibility to
                plan the implementation of the twenty-seven
                recommendations, we would welcome any and all feedback
                either as a single document from the EURALO or from
                individual members of the EURALO. All feedback will
                inform our drafting of the Detailed Implementation
                Plan.  We understand that you or the EURALO may not
                have the time to respond to all 27 recommendations, so
                we have identified seven where your input would be most
                helpful.</span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Please,
                limit your response to the process you suggest we follow
                for each implementation rather than advocating for any
                specific outcome of the recommendation.</span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:11.0pt">We
                  kindly ask you to provide us with your feedback no
                  later than 10 June 2019</span></b><span
                style="font-size:11.0pt">. If you cannot respond by that
                time, but would like to provide input, please, let us
                know at your earliest convenience by when we can expect
                your feedback.</span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">If you
                have any questions or concerns, either about the list of
                questions, or about any other aspect of the NomCom
                Review implementation, please, do not hesitate to reach
                out to us or any of ICANN’s support staff at any time.
              </span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Many
                thanks and best wishes,</span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Tom
                Barrett, Chair NomComRIWG </span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Cheryl
                Langdon-Orr, Vice-Chair NomComRIWG</span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Zahid
                Jamal, Vice-Chair NomComRIWG</span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Cc:
                ALAC, ASO AC, ccNSO Council, GAC, GNSO Council, RSSAC,
                SSAC, NCSG, RrSG, RySG, BC, IPC, ISPCP, NCUC, NPOC,
                AFRALO, APRALO, EURALO, LACRALO, NARALO.</span></p>
            <span
style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><br
                style="page-break-before:always" clear="all">
            </span>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span></p>
            <ol style="margin-top:0in" start="1" type="1">
              <li class="MsoListParagraph"
                style="margin-left:0in;mso-add-space:auto;mso-list:l4
                level1 lfo1"> <b><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Recommendation
                    10</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt">:
                  Representation on the NomCom should be re-balanced
                  immediately and then be reviewed every five years.</span><span
                  style="font-size:11.0pt"></span></li>
            </ol>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span></p>
            <ul style="margin-top:0in" type="disc">
              <li class="MsoListParagraph"
                style="margin-left:.25in;mso-add-space:auto;mso-list:l1
                level1 lfo2"> <span style="font-size:11.0pt">What
                  process, based on which principles, would you suggest
                  for  </span><span style="font-size:11.0pt">the
                  implementation of this recommendation to </span><span
                  style="font-size:11.0pt">rebalance the NomCom? And,
                  what criteria  should the overall allocation of all
                  NomCom seats among the SO/ACs be based on?</span></li>
            </ul>
          </div>
        </blockquote>
        <br>
        <font color="#3366ff">This really depends on the actual
          "balancing". The recommendation suggests the creation of a
          working group that would be tasked with undertaking an
          assessment and ultimately making recommendations for the
          actual re-balancing.<br>
          The IPT suggests (2) rebalancing could be rotational. The
          difference in balancing year on year will make this very
          complicated as the group might not include the same balance of
          stakeholders and this is likely to affect continuity. IPT
          suggestion (3) mentions the growth and expansion of SO/ACs -
          we believe that one has to be careful that gaming the system
          will not be used to multiply constituencies thus bringing more
          weight to the NomCom from a particular group of
          constituencies. At this moment in time, short of supporting a
          working group to take a deeper look at the issue and to make
          recommendations, we can only support the process that is
          currently suggested.</font><br>
        <br>
        <blockquote type="cite"
          cite="mid:7ECF19C2-0BA0-4F73-A7B5-E9351BACF7F8@icann.org">
          <div class="WordSection1">
            <ul style="margin-top:0in" type="disc">
              <li class="MsoListParagraph"
                style="margin-left:.25in;mso-add-space:auto;mso-list:l1
                level1 lfo2"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"></span><br>
              </li>
            </ul>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span></p>
            <ol style="margin-top:0in" start="2" type="1">
              <li class="MsoListParagraph"
                style="margin-left:0in;mso-add-space:auto;mso-list:l4
                level1 lfo1"> <b><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Recommendation
                    14</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt">: </span><span
                  style="font-size:11.0pt">Formalize communication
                  between the NomCom and the Board, SOs/ACs, and the PTI
                  Board in order to understand needed competencies and
                  experience.</span><span style="font-size:11.0pt"></span></li>
            </ol>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span></p>
            <ul style="margin-top:0in" type="disc">
              <li class="MsoListParagraph"
                style="margin-left:.25in;mso-add-space:auto;mso-list:l3
                level1 lfo3"> <span style="font-size:11.0pt">What
                  process would you suggest to </span><span
                  style="font-size:11.0pt">formalize the communication</span><span
                  style="font-size:11.0pt"> of the needed competencies
                  and experiences of NomCom appointees to your SO/AC?</span></li>
            </ul>
          </div>
        </blockquote>
        <br>
        <font color="#3366ff">This issue is not solely caused by lack of
          formalised communication. The Nominating Committee meets with
          SOs and ACs asking what skills are currently needed in their
          communities. But the way the question is asked at present
          appears like asking a resident what size of pipe they would
          like installed inside their house: they would have no idea. A
          questionnaire asking the right questions, addressing specific
          topics, could provide much more insights as to skill gaps in
          SOs, ACs and the ICANN Board, than an open question "what type
          of profile do you need?"<br>
          It would also be helpful if the NomCom itself would publish
          its own perception of perceived gaps in skill-sets and
          competencies on the Board, as this can serve as a good
          starting point for discussions with the community.<br>
        </font> <br>
        <blockquote type="cite"
          cite="mid:7ECF19C2-0BA0-4F73-A7B5-E9351BACF7F8@icann.org">
          <div class="WordSection1">
            <ul style="margin-top:0in" type="disc">
              <li class="MsoListParagraph"
                style="margin-left:.25in;mso-add-space:auto;mso-list:l3
                level1 lfo3"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"></span><br>
              </li>
            </ul>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span></p>
            <ol style="margin-top:0in" start="3" type="1">
              <li class="MsoListParagraph"
                style="margin-left:0in;mso-add-space:auto;mso-list:l4
                level1 lfo1"> <b><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Recommendation
                    16</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt">: </span><span
                  style="font-size:11.0pt">Implement and codify a system
                  for providing feedback to the NomCom regarding the
                  contributions and participation of members up for
                  re-appointment by the NomCom (i.e. for the Board, PTI,
                  GNSO, ALAC and ccNSO)</span><span
                  style="font-size:11.0pt"></span></li>
            </ol>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span></p>
            <ul style="margin-top:0in" type="disc">
              <li class="MsoListParagraph"
                style="margin-left:.25in;mso-add-space:auto;mso-list:l5
                level1 lfo4"> <span style="font-size:11.0pt">What
                  process would you suggest to improve feedback to the
                  NomCom regarding the contribution and participation of
                  NomCom-appointees members </span><span
                  style="font-size:11.0pt">that wish to apply for</span><span
                  style="font-size:11.0pt"> re-appointment by the
                  NomCom?</span></li>
            </ul>
          </div>
        </blockquote>
        <br>
        <font color="#3366ff">The NomCom should be provided with full
          feedback from the body into which it appointed a candidate,
          about that candidate's performance. This feedback should be
          confidential to the NomCom so as to allow for a candid
          assessment of that person's performance. Optionally, a NomCom
          appointing a candidate to a position could store a rationale
          of specific points/characteristics that resonated to appoint
          this candidate and this rationale could be made available to a
          later NomCom that would have to evaluate whether the
          expectations of that prior NomCom were fulfilled regarding
          that candidate. This additional information could help with
          the NomCom's decision to re-appoint a candidate.</font><br>
        <br>
        <blockquote type="cite"
          cite="mid:7ECF19C2-0BA0-4F73-A7B5-E9351BACF7F8@icann.org">
          <div class="WordSection1">
            <ul style="margin-top:0in" type="disc">
              <li class="MsoListParagraph"
                style="margin-left:.25in;mso-add-space:auto;mso-list:l5
                level1 lfo4"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"></span><br>
              </li>
            </ul>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span></p>
            <ol style="margin-top:0in" start="4" type="1">
              <li class="MsoListParagraph"
                style="margin-left:0in;mso-add-space:auto;mso-list:l4
                level1 lfo1"> <b><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Recommendation
                    24</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt">: An
                  empowered body of current and former NomCom members
                  should be formed to ensure greater continuity across
                  NomComs, and in particular, to recommend and assist in
                  implementing improvements to NomCom operations.</span><span
                  style="font-size:11.0pt"></span></li>
            </ol>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span></p>
            <ul style="margin-top:0in" type="disc">
              <li class="MsoListParagraph"
                style="margin-left:.25in;mso-add-space:auto;mso-list:l2
                level1 lfo5"> <span style="font-size:11.0pt">What
                  process do you suggest should be put in place to help
                  ensure cross-community consensus on developing the
                  Charter and formation of this body? The Charter would
                  address issues such as membership, term-limits, number
                  and allocation of seats.</span></li>
            </ul>
          </div>
        </blockquote>
        <font color="#3366ff"><br>
          This "empowered body" should be a cross community group
          composed of members of the community appointed by their
          respective component organisation, in the same manner as
          NomCom participants. Its membership should be made up of the
          current NomCom chair plus a past NomCom Chair, as well as past
          NomCom members across the community. The function of this
          group should be to focus purely on procedural matters and
          should not influence NomCom selections. Its primary function
          should be to make recommendations for ICANN component
          organisations to act on. It should also receive instructions
          from component organisations to implement recommendations. In
          no way should it both recommend and implement without the
          express agreement from NomCom component organisations.<br>
          <br>
        </font><br>
        <br>
        <blockquote type="cite"
          cite="mid:7ECF19C2-0BA0-4F73-A7B5-E9351BACF7F8@icann.org">
          <div class="WordSection1">
            <ul style="margin-top:0in" type="disc">
              <li class="MsoListParagraph"
                style="margin-left:.25in;mso-add-space:auto;mso-list:l2
                level1 lfo5"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"></span><br>
              </li>
            </ul>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span></p>
            <ol style="margin-top:0in" start="5" type="1">
              <li class="MsoListParagraph"
                style="margin-left:0in;mso-add-space:auto;mso-list:l4
                level1 lfo1"> <b><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Recommendation
                    25</span></b><span style="font-size:11.0pt">:
                  Improve NomCom selection decisions by assessing the
                  performance and needs of all bodies receiving NomCom
                  appointees.</span><span style="font-size:11.0pt"></span></li>
            </ol>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span></p>
            <ul style="margin-top:0in" type="disc">
              <li class="MsoListParagraph"
                style="margin-left:.25in;mso-add-space:auto;mso-list:l0
                level1 lfo6"> <span style="font-size:11.0pt">What
                  process would you suggest for your organization to
                  inform and improve future NomCom appointments?</span></li>
            </ul>
          </div>
        </blockquote>
        <br>
        <font color="#3366ff">Prior to searching for candidates, a
          questionnaire asking the right questions, addressing specific
          topics, could provide much more insights as to skill gaps in
          SOs, ACs and the ICANN Board than an open question "what type
          of profile do you need?"<br>
          The SO/AC should also provide candid feedback to the NomCom
          about a candidate's past performance. This, again, could also
          be done via a questionnaire to the Chair of the body that the
          returning candidate has been appointed to. Both questionnaires
          could be linked and compared so as to find out of the original
          skills gap was competently fulfilled. Ultimately a form of
          uniform feedback process, either through a specific feedback
          form asking pertinent questions, or through a uniform 360 peer
          review process used across all of ICANN, would help with
          comparing performance of appointed candidates.<br>
        </font> <br>
        <blockquote type="cite"
          cite="mid:7ECF19C2-0BA0-4F73-A7B5-E9351BACF7F8@icann.org">
          <div class="WordSection1">
            <ul style="margin-top:0in" type="disc">
              <li class="MsoListParagraph"
                style="margin-left:.25in;mso-add-space:auto;mso-list:l0
                level1 lfo6"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"></span><br>
              </li>
            </ul>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span></p>
            <ol style="margin-top:0in" start="6" type="1">
              <li class="MsoListParagraph"
                style="margin-left:0in;mso-add-space:auto;mso-list:l4
                level1 lfo1"> <b><span style="font-size:11.0pt"
                    lang="EN">Recommendation 27</span></b><span
                  style="font-size:11.0pt" lang="EN">: Provide clarity
                  on desire for and definition of â€œindependent
                  directors”. Upon clarification of desire and
                  definition, determine the number of specific seats for
                  â€œindependent directors”.</span><span
                  style="font-size:11.0pt"></span></li>
            </ol>
            <p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:.25in"><span
                style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span></p>
            <p class="MsoListParagraph"
style="margin-left:.75in;mso-add-space:auto;text-indent:-.25in;mso-list:l4
              level3 lfo1"> <span
                style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Symbol"><span
                  style="mso-list:Ignore">·<span style="font:7.0pt
                    "Times New Roman"">         </span></span></span><span
                style="font-size:11.0pt">What are your suggestions
                regarding the process of implementing of this
                recommendation?</span></p>
            <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt"> </span></p>
          </div>
        </blockquote>
        <br>
        <font color="#3366ff">The notion of "independent directors" is
          misguided. <br>
          Whilst the NomCom selected directors can be part of the ICANN
          community, all NomCom selected directors should be, as much as
          possible, unrelated to the Domain Name industry. They should
          be completely un-conflicted for all decisions of the ICANN
          Board and should not derive a direct income from the domain
          name business. This is needed mainly to balance out ICANN
          Board members appointed by SOs and ACs that are more likely to
          be conflicted. Declaring a conflict of interest is not enough
          in this case.<br>
          <br>
          ---- end of contribution ---<br>
          <br>
          <br>
        </font> </div>
    </div>
  </body>
</html>