[EURO-Discuss] PROBLEM: VOTE CREDENTIALS: EURALO Secretariat
d.h.kalkman at isoc.nl
Fri Jun 28 08:48:08 UTC 2013
The change is an unwanted change the voting rights and principles.
In the GA election (and almost ever other election) we could
vote for a candidate OR vote for none candidate OR don't vote.
In the electronic system (as set up) we can only can
vote for a candidate OR don't vote.
Worse there was also a framing that "don't vote" means voting for "none"
of the candidates.
On 28-6-2013 10:34, Manuel Schneider wrote:
> Am 28.06.2013 10:31, schrieb Dick Kalkman:
>> That is common bylaw practice, at least in Europe. But that doesn't mean
>> that you change the voting SYSTEM.
> please excuse my stupid question but:
> What is the change of the system we (might) have done here (except going
> from pen-and-paper to an electronic system - which in my opinion
> shouldn't matter here)?
> I don't want to argue in a certain direction here, I just want to
> understand your argument.
More information about the EURO-Discuss