[EURO-Discuss] R: R: Proposal procedure active- non-active ALSes
cw at christopherwilkinson.eu
Tue Aug 21 18:19:31 UTC 2012
1. ALAC exercises its mandate as representing the larger community of
ALS and other At Large.
ALAC is already a rather small, high level group whose credibility
depends entirely on their accountability and responsiveness to At
Large, at large.
2. Apparently there are busy ALS and less busy ALS in the ICANN
context. (Bearing in mind that most ALS have other businesses to deal
with at home.)
But beware of imposing performance criteria on ALS and threatening
dis-creditation. It would be better to use ICANN support to reactivate
or re-prioritise the ALS in question.
3. Regarding the decision-making process and the 'quorum', few
decisions need to come to a vote. It would be better to relativise the
quorum: strong quorum for a few important issues; weaker quorum for
On 21 Aug 2012, at 19:33, Carlton Samuels wrote:
More information about the EURO-Discuss