[EURO-Discuss] Lisbon Follow Up

Annette Muehlberg annette.muehlberg at web.de
Thu May 24 12:57:48 EDT 2007


full support of sébastien's statement!

let us form an umbrella of alac and ncuc for both workshops. can you 
give us the planned schedule for the "freedom of expression" workshop?

greetings to robin.

best
annette

Sébastien Bachollet schrieb:
> Dear all,
> Any combine / complementary work with others is good - especially with NCUC.
>
> Sébastien Bachollet
> Président
> sebastien.bachollet at isoc.fr
> www.egeni.org
> www.isoc.fr
>  
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Kleinwächter, Wolfgang
> [mailto:wolfgang.kleinwaechter at medienkomm.uni-halle.de] 
> Envoyé : jeudi 24 mai 2007 16:46
> À : Annette Muehlberg; sebastien.bachollet at isoc.fr; Discussion for At-Large
> Europe
> Objet : AW: [EURO-Discuss] Lisbon Follow Up
>
> Dear list
>  
> Robin Gross from IP Justice, who is also with the Non-Commercial User
> Constituency of the GNSO told me here in geneva during the IGF consultations
> that she is preparing a similar workshop on Freedom of Expression in San
> Juan (probably on Wednesday, June, 27, 2007.
>  
> What do you think, should we consider to do the two workshops under one
> unbrella as a joint activitiy of ALAC and NCUC? The two workshops are
> totally independent but complement each other. Each unit would be
> responsible for its own workshop but coulkd benefit from the joint
> advertisement. Thisn could lead to a win-win-situation. And we would give
> the ICANN constituency as a whole a clear signal, that th voice of the
> users/consumers/at large members gets louder. 
>  
> Any comments?
>  
> Wolfgang
>  
>
> ________________________________
>
> Von: Annette Muehlberg [mailto:annette.muehlberg at web.de]
> Gesendet: Do 24.05.2007 15:37
> An: sebastien.bachollet at isoc.fr; Discussion for At-Large Europe
> Cc: Kleinwächter, Wolfgang
> Betreff: Re: [EURO-Discuss] Lisbon Follow Up
>
>
>
> Sébastien, Wolfgang,
>
> I would like to join you in working on the GEO-TLD meeting, as we are
> working on .berlin
> what is the current plan?
>
> best
> annette
>
>
> Sébastien Bachollet schrieb:
>   
>> Sorry Wolfgang to take this old message but it contains 2 important
>>     
> points.
>   
>> About the so-call GEO-TLDs I would like to help you in setting up the
>> meeting especially because we started some work on .paris.
>>
>> I am not sure I will be available during the forthcoming 8th meeting of
>>     
> the
>   
>> ICANN Studienkreis (October 11-12, 2007 in Warsaw) for an EURALO outreach
>> meeting (Thursday, October 11, 9.00 - 15.00) but I think is a good idea.
>>
>> I start to work on Egeni Europe 2008 for June (just before the Icann
>>     
> meeting
>   
>> in Europe) and I think we need to do also something about Euralo.
>>
>> All the best
>>
>>
>> Sébastien Bachollet
>> Président
>> sebastien.bachollet at isoc.fr
>> www.egeni.org
>> www.isoc.fr
>>
>>
>> -----Message d'origine-----
>> De : euro-discuss-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> [mailto:euro-discuss-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] De la part de
>>     
> Wolfgang
>   
>> Kleinwächter
>> Envoyé : samedi 31 mars 2007 13:45
>> À : Discussion for At-Large Europe; Discussion for At-Large Europe; Nick
>> Ashton-Hart
>> Cc : Europe Discuss; Asia-Pacific Discuss
>> Objet : Re: [EURO-Discuss] Lisbon Follow Up
>>
>> Sorry I forgot the proposals:
>>
>> 1. the prepare a workshop for San Juan on Consumer Interests on
>>     
> geographical
>   
>> TLDs: The working title could be "Consumer Confusion vs. Consumer Choice:
>> The User Interests in  GEO-TLDs". As we discussed in Lisbon, there is a
>> growing number of related projects (.berlin, .nyc, .cym, .sco, .london
>>     
> etc)
>   
>> and there are two main arguments in favour and against. In Germany the
>>     
> local
>   
>> government which operates berlin.de argues that .berlin would create
>> consumer confusion while the federal parliament just recently adopted a
>> resolution arguing GEO-TLDs like .munich, .cologne, .saxony, .bavaria or
>> .leipzig would bring more competition and more consumer choice. I expect
>> that the ICANN Board if it has to take decisions on such TLDs  (based on
>>     
> the
>   
>> GNSO Policy paper and the GAC gTLD principles) will need some input form
>>     
> the
>   
>> user perspective and this is the ALAC. I would be ready to start the
>> preparation for such a two hour workshopin San Juan.
>>
>> 2. I propose to use the forthcoming 8th meeting of the ICANN Studienkreis
>> (October 11-12, 2007 in Warsaw) for an EURALO outreach meeting (Thursday,
>> October 11, 9.00 - 15.00) for Central and Eastern Europe. I ask all ALS
>>     
> and
>   
>> other friends of EURALO to send me contcats so that we can do outrech and
>> invite speakers. I will work together also with the Diplo Foundation.
>>     
> Input
>   
>> from ISOC Europe is welcome.
>>
>> Best
>>
>> wolfgang
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> EURO-Discuss mailing list
>> EURO-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>
>>     
> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss_atlarge-lists.i
>   
>> cann.org
>>
>>  
>>     
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
> Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.7.7/816 - Release Date: 23/05/2007
> 15:59
>  
>
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
> Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.7.7/816 - Release Date: 23/05/2007
> 15:59
>  
>
>
>
>   



More information about the EURO-Discuss mailing list