[EURO-Discuss] ALAC Candidates

[Jacqueline A. Morris]

Hi Annette
Sorry - I was going through emails in bulk as I was out on site for a couple
of days and couldn't keep up on the emails. I did see that much later...
JAM

-----Original Message-----
From: Annette Muehlberg [mailto:annette.muehlberg at web.de] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 4:50 AM
To: jam at jacquelinemorris.com; Discussion for At-Large Europe
Cc: 'Nick Ashton-Hart ICANN'
Subject: Re: [EURO-Discuss] ALAC Candidates

Hi Jaqueline,

this is exactly what I pointed out below, she could join any time an 
european ALS and this is what she did (see my mail late April 30, 2007: 
"...But we do not have to talk about this anymore concerning the current 
procedure, because the respective candidate already became a member of 
an european ALS.")
;-)
best
Annette

Jacqueline A. Morris schrieb:
>
> Hi Annette
>
> In January, the EURALO MoU was not in force, the EURALO didn't exist. 
> As an interim member, the Board could have appointed anyone in the 
> world they wanted. But now, the rules of the MoU that you guys agreed 
> to should be followed, I think.
>
> Jacqueline
>
> *From:* Annette Muehlberg [mailto:annette.muehlberg at web.de]
> *Sent:* Monday, April 30, 2007 10:15 AM
> *To:* Discussion for At-Large Europe; Nick Ashton-Hart ICANN
> *Subject:* Re: [EURO-Discuss] ALAC Candidates
>
> Dear Nick, dear all,
>
> I agree with Jeanette and would like to add, that Veronica applied 
> already in January and the ALAC, who discussed proposing Veronica as 
> one of the candidates to the ICANN Board did not get a hint that there 
> would be any restriction concerning non-ALS members.
>
> Anyhow, Veronica could join any time the network new media (an 
> accredited european ALS) if not being an ALS member would be a serious 
> problem, though I do not think it is.
>
> Instead of creating bureaucracy we should be practical: it is the same 
> situation as with the EURALO board - if the EURALO selects a person, 
> this person means something to the EURALO members and this is what 
> counts. It is enough that an ALS nominates a candidate, this candidate 
> should not be forced to join an ALS for formal reasons (this procedure 
> might raise the number of members of the nnm, which I very much 
> appreciate ;-) but it is absolutely not neccessary). As far as I know, 
> the NomCom is not restricted to select a person who is a member of an 
> ALS, the EURALO should not be so either.
>
> Best greetings
>
> Annette
>
> Jeanette Hofmann schrieb:
>
> Hi,
>  
> no matter what bylaws and MoU say, I support a broad interpretation of 
> diversity including gender, geo-political culture and political 
> perspectives. If we have the opportunity to cover several dimensions of 
> diversity, why would we not do this?
> Regarding experience with ICANN, if experience would principally count 
> more than diversity, old hands would always prevail and newcomers never 
> had a chance. Moreover, ALAC like the ICANN board can and should combine 
> a mixture of experienced and new members.
> Jeanette
>  
> Thomas Roessler schrieb:
>   
>
>     On 2007-04-29 21:06:06 +0200, Patrick Vande Walle wrote:
>
>      
>
>         
>
>             /To be frank, I'd find it a strange move to have two folks
wearing
>
>             ISOC hats as EURALO's choices to ALAC.  I'd rather see that
more
>
>             balanced; in practice, that would mean that we should appoint
>
>             Veronica and either Sebastien or you./
>
>                     
>
>         /I see nothing in the MoU or bylaws that support this vision.
>
>               
>
>     I was arguing from an overall political perspective.  I was *not*
>
>     talking about the MOU, so your response is a distraction.  (Which I
>
>     find disappointing.)
>
>      
>
>     Cheers,
>
>         
>
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________
> EURO-Discuss mailing list
> EURO-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
<mailto:EURO-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss_atlarge-lists.i
cann.org
>  
>   
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.6.2/782 - Release Date: 
> 5/1/2007 2:10 AM
>
>
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.6.2/782 - Release Date: 
> 5/1/2007 2:10 AM
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> EURO-Discuss mailing list
> EURO-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-discuss_atlarge-lists.i
cann.org
>   

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.6.2/784 - Release Date: 5/1/2007 2:57
PM
 

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.6.2/784 - Release Date: 5/1/2007 2:57
PM