[EURO-Discuss] Why no room for individuals in the RALO?
Wendy Seltzer
wendy at seltzer.com
Wed Mar 28 09:08:07 EDT 2007
Please help me to understand why you are creating a RALO that
excludes individuals who haven't found a congenial ALS. It looks to
me as though this structure just further disenfranchises the
individuals from ICANN processes. Why should the individual Internet
user support this structure?
When I asked earlier, I had thought the European group was including
individual participants.
Why the rush?
--Wendy
At 08:21 AM 3/28/2007, Nick Ashton-Hart wrote:
>Dear European Colleagues:
>
>For those who are not physically present tomorrow, but would like to
>be one of the signers of the MoU, a procedure has been created for you.
>
>PLEASE SEND IN AS BELOW NOT LATER THAN 1700 THURSDAY 29TH MARCH 2007
>
>PLEASE NOTE: There will be a way, as provided by the MoU, to be
>determined by the EURALO, for ALSes to consent to be bound by the
>MoU at a later date.
>
>Simply send to me, copied to the list, the following form of words,
>with the name of your organisation in place of the brackets, and as
>required directly below the sentence:
>
>-------
>
>I hereby consent for [INSERT ORGANISATION FULL NAME] to be bound by
>the terms of the Memorandum of Understanding between ICANN and the
>Signing Organisations in the European Region as if I were personally
>signing the document.
>
>Name
>Organisational Title
>Date
>
>----
>Note that I have attached the signature text of the MoU in the
>current version. Signatory information will change as the day goes
>on and I receive additional signatories' information.
--
Wendy Seltzer -- wendy at seltzer.org
Visiting Assistant Professor of Law, Brooklyn Law School
Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html
http://www.chillingeffects.org/
More information about the EURO-Discuss
mailing list