[Euro-board] WG: Re: [ALAC-Internal] Fwd: Re: [GTLD-WG] URGENT- ALAC statement on IRTP report

[Annette Muehlberg]

I totally agree with Wolf.
by the way, why do we discuss this on a closed list and not on the public euralo list?
best
annette

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: "Wolf Ludwig" <wolf.ludwig at comunica-ch.net>
> Gesendet: 02.05.09 22:49:25
> An: Patrick Vande Walle <patrick at vande-walle.eu>
> CC: Euro Board <euro-board at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
> Betreff: [Euro-board] WG: Re: [ALAC-Internal] Fwd: Re: [GTLD-WG] URGENT- ALAC statement on	 IRTP report


> Dear Patrick again,
> 
> just in case, your draft statement on the IRTP report will NOT be approved in time / until next Monday by ALAC, I suggest to submit it on behalf of EURALO at least. It would be sad if this/your statement wouldn't be approved and forwarded in time! Any comments by other Board members?
> 
> Best,
> Wolf
> 
> 
>  Wolf Ludwig wrote Sat, 02 May 2009 22:37:
> >Dear Patrick, 
> >
> >thanks a lot for your draft of a (ALAC) statement on the IRTP report. Your draft actually reflects most of my concerns and I hope it will be approved by the ALAC, given the narrow deadline of May 5th (what means next Tuesday!). Thanks again for your excellent work and 
> >
> >kind regards,
> >Wolf
> >
> >
> >Patrick Vande Walle wrote Sat, 02 May 2009 21:38:
> >>To follow up  on the request made during last week's teleconference, I
> >>have drafted the following statement.
> >>https://st.icann.org/gnso-liaison/index.cgi?draft_statements_related_to_irt_s_remit_from_at_large
> >>
> >>The discussions on the new gtld list focused mainly on the composition
> >>of the IRTP working group, its lack of balance and the fact that most
> >>members were from - or close to - the IPC.  Several members of At-Large
> >>mentioned they volunteered for the WG, but were not included.
> >>Hong had concerns regarding the fact that these proposed rules were in
> >>contradiction with international trade mark law. Bret Faussett made a
> >>comment about the fact the URS process is not limited in time. His
> >>comment is included in extenso.
> >>
> >>The draft statement tries to capture all these remarks. 
> >>
> >>I am not sure which process the chair wishes to follow to have some some
> >>of approval from the ALAC, given the deadline is May 5th.
> >>
> >>Patrick
> >>
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>ALAC-Internal mailing list
> >>ALAC-Internal at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> >>http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-internal_atlarge-lists.icann.org
> >>
> >>ALAC Wiki: http://st.icann.org/alac
> >>At-Large Website: http://atlarge.icann.org
> >>
> >
> >comunica-ch
> >phone +41 79 204 83 87
> >Skype: Wolf-Ludwig
> >www.comunica-ch.net
> >
> >Digitale Allemd
> >http://blog.allmend.ch -
> >
> >EURALO - ICANN's Regional At-Large Organisation
> >http://euralo.org
> >
> 
> comunica-ch
> phone +41 79 204 83 87
> Skype: Wolf-Ludwig
> www.comunica-ch.net
> 
> Digitale Allemd
> http://blog.allmend.ch -
> 
> EURALO - ICANN's Regional At-Large Organisation
> http://euralo.org
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Euro-board mailing list
> Euro-board at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/euro-board_atlarge-lists.icann.org
> 

--