[At-Large] ICANN post JPA

[Sébastien Bachollet]

Un article paru dans The Economist est apparemment bien informé des
évolutions à venir. En tous cas cette présentation des choses ne semble pas
heurter l'ICANN qui le relaie activement sur Twitter (@icann)
http://www.economist.com/businessfinance/displaystory.cfm?story_id=14517430
<http://www.economist.com/businessfinance/displaystory.cfm?story_id=14517430
&fsrc=rss> &fsrc=rss

 

Please see the Article in The Economist. It was send to Twitter and to
different lists.

 
<http://www.economist.com/businessfinance/displaystory.cfm?story_id=14517430
>
http://www.economist.com/businessfinance/displaystory.cfm?story_id=14517430

 

I think it is an important issue for At-Large.

 

I am wondering if the DOC will ask ICANN for more transparency when the
post-JPA situation was done by the DOC in a so transparent and open manner
that some usually very well inform people from the ICANN participants are
asking “what will happen?”.

 

All the best

 

The coverage by Circleid:

http://www.circleid.com/posts/icann_jpa_coverage/

 

 

Sébastien Bachollet

Président d'honneur - Isoc France

 <mailto:sebastien.bachollet at isoc.fr> sebastien.bachollet at isoc.fr

 <http://www.egeni.org/> www.egeni.org

 <http://www.isoc.fr/> www.isoc.fr