[At-Large] New gTLD implementation Consultation Session London 15 July 2009

[Seth Johnson]

:-)

True.  Just be sure as we proceed toward that halcyon future, that you
don't provide tools for our oppression along the way.  Government of, by
and for the people requires first assuring that those entities that have
no fidelity to any such structures, do not overrule us all.

It's doubtful we'd disagree on this, though it's a distinction that
needs to be understood.

In the meantime, in this context, ICANN and the IRT are exhibit No. 1.  :-)


Seth

-----Original Message-----
From: carlos aguirre <carlosaguirre62 at hotmail.com>
To: At-Large Worldwide <at-large at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 13:05:14 +0000
Subject: Re: [At-Large] New gTLD implementation Consultation Session
London	15 July 2009

> 
> Dear All. Legal traditions are that !!! old and tradicional law.
> World has changed and the paradigms the same ! We need to have new
> rules for new situations inside of the new Information Society and
> their new paradigms. 
> 
> Carlos Dionisio Aguirre
> abogado - Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordoba - Argentina -
> 
> *54-351-424-2123 / 423-5423
> 
> www.derechoytecnologia.com.ar
> 
> http://ar.ageiadensi.org 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 08:58:30 -0400
> > From: seth.johnson at RealMeasures.dyndns.org
> > To: at-large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> > Subject: Re: [At-Large] New gTLD implementation Consultation
> Session London	15 July 2009
> > 
> > 
> > Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl at gih.com> said:
> > > 
> > > I've heard a lot of people say that Intellectual Property & 
> > > the work of the IRT fell outside ICANN's scope.
> > > 
> > > Someone asked this specific question & Jonathan Cohen, 
> > > Senior Partner at Shapiro Cohen replied that this was false: 
> > > according to him, the ICANN bylaws & principles mention 
> > > protection of Intellectual Property & Marks, and that 
> > > therefore, the IRT's proposals fall completely *in line* 
> > > with ICANN's *core mission*.
> > > 
> > > I'd be interested if this was confirmed/denied.
> > 
> > 
> > The issue is more how can they proceed with the proposals they're
> > presenting without addressing the fact that they're changing
> > established legal traditions.
> > 
> > 
> > Seth
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > At-Large mailing list
> > At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> >
> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large_atlarge-list
> s.icann.org
> > 
> > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Volvé famosa a tu mascota con MSN
> http://events.latam.msn.com/tumascota
> _______________________________________________
> At-Large mailing list
> At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large_atlarge-list
> s.icann.org
> 
> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org