[At-Large] [ALAC] Request for input from the ALAC into the IRT's workon trademark issues with the introduction of new gTLDs

At-Large Staff staff at atlarge.icann.org
Mon Mar 23 06:41:55 EDT 2009


May we remind those interested in participating in this working group of the
following, sent to the Announcement list on 18th March:

Anyone who wishes to participate in the At-Large new gTLD Working Group on
the IRT Process is welcome to do so - please subscribe to the New GTLD
Mailing list at this link:
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gtld-wg_atlarge-lists.icann.
org. NOTE: If you have previously sent an email to the staff, or in
community mailing lists, you should still join the mailing list directly as
all At-Large lists are self-service, you have not been subscribed by a
third-party.

A microsite for the At-Large working group on the IRT is being established
at 
https://st.icann.org/gnso-liaison/index.cgi?at_large_irt_process_working_gro
up. Check back often as content will be added often.


On 18/03/2009 15:29, "Andres Piazza" <investigaciones at densi.com.ar> wrote:

> I´m in.
> 
> Andrés Piazza
> Research Director AGEIA DENSI
> Dot Mobi Policy Advisory Board Member
> http://ar.ageiadensi.org
>  http://www.derechoytecnologia.com.ar
> http://advisorygroup.mobi/policy_advisory.htm
> 
> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: alac-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> [mailto:alac-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] En nombre de carlos aguirre
> Enviado el: miércoles, 18 de marzo de 2009 11:09 a.m.
> Para: langdonorr at gmail.com; lista publica de ALAC
> CC: At-Large Staff; At-Large Worldwide
> Asunto: Re: [ALAC] Request for input from the ALAC into the IRT's workon
> trademark issues with the introduction of new gTLDs
> 
> 
> If it possible, I would like to work in.
> 
> 
> 
> Carlos Dionisio Aguirreabogado - Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordoba - Argentina
> -
> *54-351-424-2123 / 423-5423
> www.derechoytecnologia.com.ar
> http://ar.ageiadensi.org
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> > Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 12:30:49 +1100
>> > From: langdonorr at gmail.com
>> > To: alac at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> > CC: staff at atlarge.icann.org; at-large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> > Subject: [ALAC] Request for input from the ALAC into the IRT's work on
> trademark issues with the introduction of new gTLDs
>> >
>> > Building on the energy and enthusiasm that I trust those of you who were
>> > involved in the Mexico Meeting and At-Large Users Summit, still have I
> want,
>> > as Chair of the ALAC, to bring to the attention of At-Large and
> particularly
>> > the leadership of the RALO's and ALS's am matter arising from the Mexico
>> > ICANN meeting regarding tho formation and work of the IRT and indeed both
>> > the ALAC's and At-Larges input into its activities...
>> >
>> >
>> > Firstly I have included in the body of this message a copy in full, of a
>> > formal request from the President of the GNSO's Intellectual Property
>> > Constituency, Mr. Steve Metalitz, requesting ALAC specific input into this
>> > process in a very short time frame (we will add this to the Agenda for our
>> > March 24th ALAC Meeting) and pointing out the opportunity for individual
>> > (here I encourage also ALSes and RALO's to also respond directly)
>> > submissions to be provided directly to
>> > *ip-issues at icann.org*<ip-issues at icann.org>
>> > .
>> >
>> >
>> > Secondly two suitably qualified ALAC Members (in their individual
> capacity)
>> > have offered themselves to the IRT as Members these are Mr. Beau Brendler,
>> > and Ms. Vanda Scartezini, I would like at the ALAC Meeting to endorse
> these
>> > two IRT Members as formal representatives of the ALAC to this WG, and
>> > encourage discussion in the ALAC Working List regarding this matter prior
> to
>> > our discussion of this as an Agenda item at te March meeting as well...
>> >
>> >
>> > Related to this however is my desire to involve suitably qualified and
>> > experienced representatives from At-Large and the ALSes into an Ad Hoc
> ALAC
>> > WG (to operate as a subset of the existing new gTLD WG already established
>> > to give support and ensure that a balanced regional view on this important
>> > topic is provided (to include for example the matters of Traditional
> Rights
>> > that I heard discussed in the new gTLDs WG at the Summit meeting... I know
>> > we have plenty of talent ( all be it time poor talent) in this area of
>> > expertise so I want to encourage any one who can contribute over the next
>> > few days / weeks on this topic to join the Wiki Work space we will set up
>> > for the purpose, by sending your name and details to
>> > staff at atlarge.icann.orgas soon as possible this will help spread the
>> > workload AND ensure a good
>> > opportunity for input from "the edges" ... To this end I encourage the
> RALO
>> > leadership in each Region to actively, source, approach and encourage
> people
>> > you know of to step up and assist.
>> >
>> >
>> > I will ask staff to also send out an Announce email once the WIKI Work
> space
>> > is set up...
>> >
>> > CLO
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > <email message from IPC>
>> >
>> > Dear Cheryl:
>> >
>> > During its March 6 meeting in Mexico City, the ICANN Board of Directors
>> > passed a resolution calling for the creation of an implementation
>> > recommendation team to "develop and propose solutions to the overarching
>> > issues of trademark protection in connection with the introduction of new
>> > gTLDs." That resolution directs the implementation recommendation team to
>> > "solicit input from the interested constituencies." (The full text of the
>> > resolution is accessible at*
>> >
> http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-06mar09.htm*<http://www.icann.or
> g/en/minutes/resolutions-06mar09.htm>
>> > .)
>> >
>> >
>> > The Board requested the GNSO's Intellectual Property Constituency (IPC) to
>> > convene an implementation recommendation team (IRT). Although the IPC is
>> > still developing the time line for the IRT's work and the criteria for
>> > membership on the IRT, the IPC wishes to begin soliciting input from the
>> > constituencies. Accordingly, we write to request that input from the
>> > At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC).
>> >
>> > In particular, we seek the ALAC's proposals for solutions (new or
> existing)
>> > to trademark protection issues that have been identified in connection
> with
>> > the introduction of new gTLDs, concerns about such solutions, and any
> other
>> > pertinent information your ALAC believes the IRT should have as it begins
>> > its work. We encourage you to be as specific as possible. With regard to
>> > solutions, it is particularly important that solutions be scalable and
>> > fair. Finally, with the exception of identifying support for and/or
>> > identifying concerns with specific measures, it is not necessary to submit
>> > proposals about solutions that were set forth in public comments on the
>> > first draft of the Draft Applicant Guidebook; an IPC team is already hard
> at
>> > work identifying them. Those proposals can be seen by reviewing the public
>> > comments sections at <*
>> >
> http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/comments-en.htm#resources*<http://w
> ww.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/comments-en.htm#resources>>,
>> > and many of them are in short form in section IX of the comment analysis
> at
>> > <*
>> >
> http://icann.x.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/agv1-analysis-public-comments-1
> 8feb09-en.pdf
>> >
> *<http://icann.x.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/agv1-analysis-public-comments
> -18feb09-en.pdf>
>>> > >.
>> >
>> >
>> > Given the timetable set forth in the Board's resolution, we request your
>> > input not later than March 25, 2009. If it is not possible under the
>> > internal processes of ALAC to develop and approve any formal submission in
>> > the requested time frame, individual submissions from ALAC members are
>> > permitted. Your ALAC comments will have significant impact on the quality
>> > of the proposal and the speed that it will adopted, so please carefully
>> > consider your input, make it as complete as possible and try to respect
> the
>> > objectives of trying to protect consumers from harm while creating a fair
>> > and scalable solution.
>> >
>> > Please direct all submissions to *ip-issues at icann.org*
> <ip-issues at icann.org>
>> > .
>> >
>> > Thank you!
>> >
>> > Steve Metalitz, IPC president
>> >
>> > --
>> > Cheryl Langdon-Orr
>> > (CLO)
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > ALAC mailing list
>> > ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> >
> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> >
>> > At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>> > ALAC Working Wiki: http://st.icann.org/alac
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Encontrá el auto de tus sueños en MSN
> http://xml.mercadolibre.com.ar/org-img/msn/autos.html
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
> 
> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> ALAC Working Wiki: http://st.icann.org/alac
> 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 7.5.557 / Virus Database: 270.11.18/2009 - Release Date: 18/03/2009
> 07:17 a.m.
> 
> 
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 7.5.557 / Virus Database: 270.11.18/2009 - Release Date: 18/03/2009
> 07:17 a.m.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> At-Large mailing list
> At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large_atlarge-lists.icann.o
> rg
> 
> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
> 

-- 
Regards,

Nick Ashton-Hart, Heidi Ullrich, Matthias Langenegger, Gisella Gruber-White,
Marie-Helene Bouchoms
ICANN At-Large Staff
email: staff at atlarge.icann.org



More information about the At-Large mailing list