[At-Large] [ALAC] WHOIS Studies
Karl Auerbach
karl at cavebear.com
Thu Feb 19 22:26:42 EST 2009
Roberto Gaetano wrote:
To begin - it is really good to see your name on an email again. I trust you are doing well.
>> I disagree. Though many countries have privacy protections
>> not provided by the USA, I suspect that those countries will
>> allow disclosure when a party agrees to that disclosure, by contract.
>
> Maybe I'm missing something here, but the issue is what happens when the
> party does *not* agree.
> In some countries you cannot force them to agree, therefore the problem
> about different competitive advantage for registrars.
This is far from an easy point. There is in US contract law the idea of a "contract of
adhesion" - the most typical example is when you drive into a parking lot and a machine
ejects a bit of cardboard on which are printed purported terms and conditions. Are you
bound by those or not?
Suffice it to say that the answer to that question probably varies from jurisdiction to
jurisdiction around the world. And since the Whois issue spans the world, I'm sure that
local answers will vary.
One aspect that may influence those answers is the fact that there is really no practical
alternative to ICANN's whois regime. (Well, there are the ccTLDs and that perhaps weakens
the entire thought that follows.)
One may argue that because of ICANN's all-enveloping coverage and also the fact that
ICANN's UDRP and whois policies were made without much (or any) power of the public at
large to affect those policies, that the privacy-breaking aspects of whois should be
interpreted in a narrow or weak (i.e. protective of privacy) way.
I have long suggested that any one who makes an inquiry into the whois data should be
obligated to leave an electric "calling card" record that informs the data subject of the
name, identity, affiliation, contact information, and asserted reason for making the
inquiry. It seems only fair that if Mr. X is asking about you that you should be able to
know who Mr. X is and why he's looking you up.
--karl--
More information about the At-Large
mailing list