[At-Large] Auerbach: "It is my view that ICANN ought to scrapthe ALAC in its entirety"

[cristian casas]

Por favor me urde tener el documento  disponible en español de El Grupo de 
Trabajo de Revisión ALAC - proyecto de Informe Final [PDF, 309K] sobre las 
mejoras ALAC.

Más detalles de la revisión puede ALAC
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jacqueline A. Morris" <jam en jacquelinemorris.com>
To: "At-Large Worldwide" <at-large en atlarge-lists.icann.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 7:16 PM
Subject: Re: [At-Large] Auerbach: "It is my view that ICANN ought to 
scrapthe ALAC in its entirety"


> Clarification - not at the same time - all At Large members and 
> non-members can be proposed for the ALAC and be voted or appointed one of 
> the 15
> Jacqueline A. Morris wrote:
>> As far as I know the At Large list (this list on which we are currently 
>> posting) is open to all who are willing to join. The ALAC is a committee 
>> that consists of 15 members, some chosen by the NomCom and some chosen by 
>> the regions. So most people who are in the At Large will not be able to 
>> be  members of the ALAC (restricted to 15 persons)
>> Jacqueline
>> Elisabeth Porteneuve wrote:
>>> I concur wholeheartedly with Karl's notes.
>>> I have been here for ICANN and DNSO creation, five long years, and 
>>> should not have much difficulty to follow or catch up with its 
>>> organizations or committees. Still, I cannot comprehend ALAC.
>>> Sometimes I wonder if ALAC, or At Large, or whatever acronym used here 
>>> and designating something in a dark forest of its labyrinthine form, 
>>> have been formed to prevent good people to discuss Internet matters 
>>> together, learn, share and rise important issues.
>>>
>>> "The current ALAC was a step backwards from the system that it replaced. 
>>> That prior system self-organized and self-funded itself into a vibrant 
>>> system of debate and information exchange. ICANN merely ran the election 
>>> machinery. In that system the public itself nominated and elected people 
>>> onto the ICANN Board of Directors, a far cry from the thickly insulating 
>>> committee upon committee upon committee intricacy of the present ALAC."
>>>
>>> In early ICANN's days we had the GA "ga" list, open to anyone
>>> willing to join. I still do not know if I am legitimate person on this 
>>> ALAC, At Large or whatever acronym list. And yes, I am that pesky 
>>> individual, only individual, not accepting to be segregated into 
>>> geographic boxes.
>>>
>>> Thanks Karl, thanks Danny.
>>>
>>> Elisabeth Porteneuve
>>>
>>>
>>>> Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 12:30:46 -0800 (PST)
>>>>
>>>> My thanks to Karl for his honest assessment of what ought to be done 
>>>> with the ALAC.
>>>> You may read the ALAC Review WG Draft Final Report (along with Karl's 
>>>> comments) here:
>>>> http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-11feb09-en.htm
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> At-Large mailing list
>>> At-Large en atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large_atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>>
>>> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> At-Large mailing list
>> At-Large en atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large_atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>
>> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
>
>
>
>