[At-Large] [GTLD-WG] my submissions to new gTLD statement

[Danny Younger]

For what's it's worth, I concur with this assessment and look forward to having more details on the preconditions articulated.

Danny

--- On Wed, 1/7/09, Brendler, Beau <Brenbe at consumer.org> wrote:

> From: Brendler, Beau <Brenbe at consumer.org>
> Subject: RE: [GTLD-WG] my submissions to new gTLD statement
> To: "dannyyounger at yahoo.com" <dannyyounger at yahoo.com>, "At-Large Worldwide" <at-large at atlarge-lists.icann.org>, "gtld-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org" <gtld-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
> Date: Wednesday, January 7, 2009, 1:11 PM
> still on vacation, but: stop the process until certain
> conditions are met, basically, what's spelled out in the
> letters from the DOC and DOJ. Economic analysis; safety,
> security and stability concerns; substantial demonstration
> of capacity to handle new gTLDs.
> 
> I can provide more detail on Friday though I suspect that
> will be too late
> 
> plus, I would like to hear what the ALAC thinks we should
> do -- there has not been much response to this other than
> from you, John, Bill, and a few trolls. I would have thought
> the Europeans would have strong objections to even
> suggesting halting the new gTLD process
> ________________________________________