[At-Large] Fwd: [ALAC-Announce] Result of the vote on the updated ALAC Response

[Fatimata Seye Sylla]

Danny,

I don't think the information the system is providing is correct this time.
Many (at least two, Hawa and me) have voted and have not been counted.

Best,
Fatimata

On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 7:17 AM, Danny Younger <dannyyounger at yahoo.com>wrote:

> Adam,
>
> The proper thing to do is to advise the Board Governance Committee that the
> ALAC Response to the BGC WG midpoint consultation report on
> ALAC Review was improperly sent to them, had not been ratified by the
> membership at the time of its release, and still hasn't been ratified even
> after a second vote.
>
> At the very least, the ALAC should be honest about its ongoing inability to
> reach a quorate vote -- this is not the first time that this has happened,
> and this is a consideration that the BGC should be aware of as it moves
> forward with its review (as it points, once again, to the current
> dysfunctional state of the ALAC).
>
> Danny
>
> [At-Large] Fwd: [ALAC-Announce] Result of the vote on the updated ALAC
> Response
> Adam Peake ajp at glocom.ac.jp
> Wed Jan 7 06:33:32 EST 2009
>
> I think we should consider how to call the vote again.
>
> We should not leave this important issue as failed for lack of quorum.
>
> Do our procedures allow for another (3rd)
> attempt?  Is a new motion required?  If we can
> vote again I would like it added to the agenda of
> the Jan 13th ALAC call
> <https://st.icann.org/alac/index.cgi?13_january_2009>.
>
> For clarification, if we are to consider a new
> vote I suggest it should be yes or no on:
>
> "Do you endorse the updated ALAC Response to the BGC WG midpoint
> consultation report on the ALAC Review as an official ALAC Statement?"
>
> Thanks,
>
> Adam
>
>
>
> >
> >       <mailto:alac-announce-request at
> atlarge-lists.icann.org?subject=subscribe>
> >Sender: alac-announce-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> >
> >Dear all,
> >
> >Seven out of 15 ALAC Members have voted in the recent vote on the updated
> >ALAC Response to the BGC WG midpoint consultation report, therefore the
> >quorum was not reached.
> >
> >Number of voters: 7· Group size: 15 · Percentage voted: 46.67%
> >
> >³Would you like to endorse the updated ALAC Response to the BGC WG
> midpoint
> >consultation report on the ALAC Review as an official ALAC Statement?²
> >
> >Yes  (85.71%)     (Adam Peake, Patrick Vande Walle, Sébastien Bachollet,
> >Beau Brendler, Robert Guerra, Cheryl Landon-Orr)
> >
> >No (14.29%)      (Carlos Aguirre)
> >
> >Abstain (0.00%)
> >
> >You may verify the results independently under:
> >https://www.bigpulse.com/pollresults?code=eTuRkbjiyZCk2DRJXXAU
> >
> >When announcing the results of voting, we have been requested by the Chair
> >to provide a listing of those who have not voted. Accordingly, we can
> >confirm that the following ALAC member did not participate in the
> balloting:
> >
> >Alan Greenberg
> >Vanda Scartezini
> >Fatimata Seye Sylla
> >Hawa Diakite
> >Mohamed El Bashir
> >Jose Ovidio Salgueiro
> >Vivek Vivekandan
> >Thu Hue Nguyen
> >
> >Regards,
> >
> >Nick Ashton-Hart, Matthias Langenegger, Marie-Hélène Bouchoms, Heidi
> Ullrich
> >ICANN At-Large Staff
> >email: staff at atlarge.icann.org
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >ALAC-Announce mailing list
> >ALAC-Announce at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> >
> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-announce_atlarge-lists.icann.org
> >
> >At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> At-Large mailing list
> At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>
> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large_atlarge-lists.icann.org
>
> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
>



-- 
Fatimata Seye Sylla
Presidente Bokk Jang Bokk Jeff
Coordonnatrice ACSIS - Senegal
BP : 22336 Dakar Senegal
Tel : 221 33 864 4284 / 1301 552 8282
email :  fsylla at gmail.com
          fsylla at orange.sn