[At-Large] [NA-Discuss] Draft ISPCP Comments on the Mid-point consultation report on ALAC Review

[JFC Morfin]

At 19:19 16/12/2008, Ross Rader wrote:

>On Dec 16, 2008, at 1:15 PM, JFC Morfin wrote:
>
>>I afraid that DNS is a very small part of what @large Internet lead
>>users are interested in
>
>That's reasonable, but ICANN isn't the place to bring those issues
>forward.

ICANN is supposedly in charge of IPv6 management and DNSSEC for the 
Legcacy Internet, which at the present time are the true key issues 
of the world digital ecosystem. Also, per se ICANN is _the_ Internet 
Governance at large problem, because of its ill positionning (what it 
wants to unilaterally do, the way it behaves IRT users, its relations 
with the US Government, the GAC international oddity) that has to be 
addressed. The status if ICANN and its staff hi-jacking we suffer for 
years should be the main issue for ALAC.

If we really want to consider the DNS, then the DNS at large problem 
is to be considered and the TBT (technical barriers to trade), HR and 
WSIS violations that IDNA and Fast Crack represent. The problem is 
not to manage the ICANN DNS, but to try to preserve the world from 
the ICANN insolent and polluting behavior in the domain name space.
jfc