[At-Large] [ALAC] ExecComm Mission Creep (was Re: [NA-Discuss] ALAC Mid-point consultation report - Personal comments)

[Danny Younger]

Carlton,

Evan is referring to this sentence in point #2 of the ALAC response to the Mid-Term Consultation:

"Please note mechanisms of this process would need careful consideration and further discussed, but could take the form of either one of the two Board Seats being initially made by the ALAC per se or perhaps more preferably an ALAC to Board Liaison role being maintained where the Liaison is the ALAC Chair or nominee of the ALAC Executive."

You will note that even though this Statement hasn't been ratified by the ALAC, it was submitted anyway and points to new powers being considered for the ExCom.



--- On Mon, 12/15/08, Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels at uwimona.edu.jm> wrote:

> From: Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels at uwimona.edu.jm>
> Subject: Re: [ALAC] ExecComm Mission Creep (was Re: [NA-Discuss] ALAC Mid-point consultation report - Personal comments)
> To: "Evan Leibovitch" <evan at telly.org>
> Cc: dannyyounger at yahoo.com, "At-Large Worldwide" <alac at atlarge-lists.icann.org>, "At-Large Worldwide" <at-large at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
> Date: Monday, December 15, 2008, 2:32 PM
> I'm looking for "this recommendation" and
> cannot find it. What is it?
> Carlton
> 
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 11:47 AM, Evan Leibovitch
> <evan at telly.org> wrote:
> 
> >
> > I continue to be bothered by the subtle yet steadily
> increasing role of
> > the ALAC Executive Committee. I note that this
> recommendation -- which I
> > honestly don't recall being sent past the RALOs
> for comment -- suggests
> > that the ALAC ExecComm (rather than the whole ALAC) be
> given the
> > authority to appoint a Board Liaision.
> >
> > We were once told that the ExecComm was only needed
> for issues of
> > unexpected urgency. Now we see that the ExecComm wants
> to -- in
> > recommendations it has itself written -- be given
> consideration to have
> > the power to make appointments and decisions on
> predictable timelines.
> >
> > If ALAC is dysfunctional -- which it most certainly is
> to me -- then
> > that needs to be confronted directly. I had fears that
> the ExecComm was
> > created to avoid the messiness of fixing the whole
> ALAC, under the
> > pretence of necessary expediency. I now find these
> fears being realized.
> >
> > Perhaps ALAC should take a page from the Summit, in
> which participants
> > are surveyed (and taking the survey is mandatory)
> regarding their
> > subject preferences, then _required_ to actively
> participate in working
> > groups. Those who don't do this are denied travel
> support and ultimately
> > the ability to be complete participants.
> >
> > If only the same zeal used to demand participation
> from Summit delegates
> > was applied to ALAC itself, then the ExecComm would
> not need to exist.
> > Or maybe that is not the goal for some. It is
> noteworthy that, despite
> > many months of member performance reports in our
> hands, ALAC has not
> > begun to exercise section 11 of its charter (the
> recall provisions) even
> > once. I have already found myself as a RALO chair
> having to take
> > performance issues of our ALAC reps into our own
> hands, having exhausted
> > my patience with ALAC's ability (or interest) to
> fix itself in this regard.
> >
> > The Board liaison is the only reference to the
> ExecComm in this
> > document. Its presence, while arguably minor, points
> to a disturbing --
> > if very slow and maybe not deliberate -- mind-set to
> give the ExecComm
> > powers that might be seen to be poorly executed should
> they be
> > "entrusted" to the whole ALAC. This trend
> should be stopped and if
> > possible reversed. We may have to acknowledge that a
> very few people
> > shoulder the load of the whole group, but we need to
> address this by
> > increasing participation by all rather than
> entrenching a special
> > position for the inner core.
> >
> > It is clear that the very existence of the ExecComm
> indicates a failure
> > of ALAC effectiveness; it seems ironic to point this
> out in discussion
> > of a document related to the ALAC review.
> >
> > - Evan
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ALAC mailing list
> > ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> >
> >
> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
> >
> > At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
> > ALAC Working Wiki: http://st.icann.org/alac
> >