[At-Large] (No so) Serious Allegations

[JFC Morfin]

At 17:35 27/11/2008, Ross Rader wrote:
>On Nov 27, 2008, at 11:31 AM, JFC Morfin wrote:
>>"global" means opposite things in American ("unique") and in other
>>languages ("all together")
>
>I am neither American, nor unaware of what "global" means.
>
>The internet is a joining of networks, by users and network operators.
>International implies "between nations" and I am not willing to give
>up my freedom to connect "between networks" and "between people" in
>favor of a model that requires me to first check in with my government
>in accordance with a treaty it has with your government.

Then you are by your own. And I am certainly with you. But I feel 
like if you said "I like planet Earth, but I do not want to tuch 
continents and islands" (Governement and treaties exist if you like 
it or not). I do not really see how you want to manage. Because most 
of the independent people you will relate with will try to make big 
entities compete and protect them "in between". Big entities are 
Govs, Google, ICANN, ITU and the like.

IMHO the easiest ones to trigger are Governments because they have to 
be coherent with their one self, so you want to help them stay in a 
good position enough in your own interest. Google, etc. are more 
difficult to influence if they do not employ you. ICANN and ITU have 
to be infiltrated or replaced.

Even if you have much money or if you are very clever I do not see 
how you can obtain the best model for what you want to do, and what 
is your model.

jfc