[At-Large] [ALAC-Internal] Call for nominations to ALAC Liaison and Appointment Positions for 2008 - 2009

[Annette Muehlberg]

Jaqueline and Adam are right. But I think that not only ALAC memberŽs but also PierreŽs understanding of his role is - that he is expected to have a good working relationship with the ALAC.
Best
Annette


> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: "Adam Peake" <ajp at glocom.ac.jp>
> Gesendet: 03.11.08 17:33:28
> An: ALAC Internal List <alac-internal at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
> CC: At-Large Worldwide <at-large at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
> Betreff: Re: [At-Large] [ALAC-Internal] Call for nominations to ALAC Liaison and Appointment Positions for 2008 - 2009


> If I remember correctly...
> 
> Initially there was no civil society/At large member of the PSC. It 
> took lobbying, questions in the public forum, etc to reach the stage 
> Jacqueline describes where names were submitted.
> 
> Adam
> 
> 
> 
> At 5:36 PM +0200 11/3/08, Jacqueline A. Morris wrote:
> >Hi Evan
> >We never got asked for a LIAISON to that committee. I am sure Cheryl 
> >can attempt to negotiate one, but from what I see, no other group 
> >has such a liaison. We were asked to provide names for the 
> >President's consideration, and Pierre was appointed by the President 
> >to his Strategy Committee, and he serves at the President's 
> >pleasure.  That was in the Morocco meeting, if my memory serves me 
> >right - Annette was Chair. So as far as I know there is NO PRECEDENT 
> >for a liaison. Obviously there is a mistake on the wiki.
> >Of course if you want to follow their work and consolidate and 
> >report back to the At Large on what they are doing, I certainly 
> >support that, but I don't see any formal role for liaison without 
> >the PSC's agreement, and for us to request one when I don't think 
> >others have any would IMO be a waste of our time.
> >
> >Jacqueline
> >
> >Evan Leibovitch wrote:
> >>I wish to stand for the position of liaison to the Presidents 
> >>Strategy Committee.
> >>
> >>Based on the meeting we had yesterday -- the first time I had 
> >>_ever_ seen or heard from the committee, combined with the low 
> >>quality of that discussion -- I believe that such a liaison is 
> >>required regardless of whether the PSC requires such role. ALAC 
> >>requires someone to keep track of what PSC is doing, and also to 
> >>ensure that PSC sufficiently solicits ALAC) at *any* time it wants 
> >>to solicit the POV of individual end-users.
> >>
> >>According to 
> >>https://st.icann.org/alac/index.cgi?president_s_strategy_committee_liaison 
> >>ALAC has defined has a "Liaison", listed as Pierre Dandjinou..As we 
> >>found out yesterday, Pierre was an ALAC-selected appointment to the 
> >>PSC, but neither he not anyone in PSC sees themselves as an ALAC 
> >>liaison role. I believe that such a link is needed and the 
> >>precedent of a liaison exists. I don't want to wait another two 
> >>years to hear from them and I believe that filling this role will 
> >>address the lack of communications withthis important committee.
> >>
> >>- Evan
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>ALAC-Internal mailing list
> >>ALAC-Internal at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> >>http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-internal_atlarge-lists.icann.org
> >>
> >>ALAC Wiki: http://st.icann.org/alac
> >>At-Large Website: http://atlarge.icann.org
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >ALAC-Internal mailing list
> >ALAC-Internal at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> >http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac-internal_atlarge-lists.icann.org
> >
> >ALAC Wiki: http://st.icann.org/alac
> >At-Large Website: http://atlarge.icann.org
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> At-Large mailing list
> At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large_atlarge-lists.icann.org
> 
> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
> 

--