[At-Large] RES: Nomination: Alan Greenberg GNSO Liaison
Vanda Scartezini UOL
vanda at uol.com.br
Sun Oct 26 20:29:12 EDT 2008
Excellent Alan. You are the best for the job!
Vanda Scartezini
Polo Consultores Associados
Alameda Santos 1470 #1407
Tel - +55113266.6253
Mob- +55118181.1464
vanda at uol.com.br
Before print think about the Environment
"The information contained in this message - and attached files - is restricted, and its confidentiality protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and notify the sender immediately. Please be advised that the improper use of the aforementioned information will create grounds for legal action."
"As informações existentes nesta mensagem e nos arquivos anexados são para uso restrito, com sigilo protegido por lei. Caso não seja o destinatário, favor apagar esta mensagem e notificar o remetente. O uso impróprio das informações desta mensagem será tratado conforme a legislação em vigor."
-----Mensagem original-----
De: at-large-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org [mailto:at-large-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] Em nome de Alan Greenberg
Enviada em: sábado, 25 de outubro de 2008 19:13
Para: At-Large Worldwide
Assunto: Re: [At-Large] Nomination: Alan Greenberg GNSO Liaison
At 24/10/2008 02:06 AM, Adam Peake wrote:
>I nominate Alan Greenberg for the position as GNSO Liaison.
>
>Best,
>
>Adam
I accept this nomination.
I have thought long and hard about whether I want to continue in this
role in addition to the roles of Rapporteur for which I have also
been nominated.
I have decided that, should I be elected, both are appropriate. I
understand that this will be a heavy load, but I am not a stranger to
this. The reasons follow:
- I think that I have been effective over the last two years.
- Having started with the request for an issues report on expired
domain names, I feel that I want to follow this through to the PDP
stage. This will clearly be a major GNSO policy focus for me, and I
do not think that adding the rest of the GNSO Liaison
responsibilities to this will be unreasonable.
- This will be year of very significant change for the GNSO, with the
preparation and then actual transition to the new structure. I think
that some measure of continuity will be very important to ensuring
that our community is well served by that process.
_ On the Rapporteur side, many of you may be tired of me repeatedly
talking about the need to develop a better functioning and far more
productive ALAC. There are several aspects to this. We need to
address policy issues in a time manner, and to do this, we need to
pick carefully what policy issues we address. To do this effectively,
I think that we also need to streamline our administrative processes
so that we do not have to continually focus on that part of our work.
If the ALAC Review Mid-Point Consultation Report is any indication
(and I think that it is a strong one), we are going to held
accountable for our performance, and we do not have a lot of time to
get ready. I believe that I can be helpful in both aspects.
Alan
_______________________________________________
At-Large mailing list
At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large_atlarge-lists.icann.org
At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
More information about the At-Large
mailing list