[At-Large] [NA-Discuss] Post-Paris Review

[JFC Morfin]

At 17:37 16/07/2008, Ross Rader wrote:
>Evan Leibovitch wrote:
>  > The apparent staff obsession to fund constituencies that don't need the
>  > subsidy, at the expense of those who do, is what I consider worrisome.
>
>I don't see this as a staff push. My slightly uninvolved view is that
>this emanates mostly from the GNSO Council where constituency interests
>contend that their work is so important that they absolutely must have
>travel funding. Perhaps Alan could shed some better light on the issue,
>as I've not been directly involved in the Council for the better part of
>a year.

May be a stupid question, but what has GNSO to do with ALAC?
90% of the ALAC concerns are out of the GNSO scope.
jfc