[At-Large] Front-running

[Izumi AIZU]

I think 3 month hold will be good. Of course, this does not exclude,
in my understanding, changing the position IF something wrong still
happens immediately. Then we can ask for quicker action as emergency
or something like that.

izumi

2008/6/22 Jacqueline A. Morris <jam at jacquelinemorris.com>:
> Holding until we see IF and HOW the proposed measures affect the
> environment makes sense. There MAY be no more frontrunning problem after
> the implementation of these measures. I'd suggest that we ask for a 3 or
> 6 month hold and then a review to evaluate the success or not of the
> measures and then decide to go forward or not on additional activities
> re front running
> Jacqueline
> Alan Greenberg wrote:
>> The GNSO is discussing putting the Front Running issue on hold
>> pending the Board's decision on the limitation of use of the AGP (and
>> the 20 cent Registrar fee waiver).
>>
>> I have been asked for thoughts on whether there is an ALAC/At-Large
>> perception that the GNSO should go full speed ahead on the front
>> running issue regardless of the changing AGP environment (recognizing
>> that work put into this impact progress on possibly more crucial issues).
>>
>> Alan
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ALAC mailing list
>> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>
>> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
>
> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
>
>



-- 
 >> Izumi Aizu <<

 Institute for HyperNetwork Society, Oita
 Kumon Center, Tama University, Tokyo
 Japan
 * * * * *
 << Writing the Future of the History >>
 www.anr.org