[At-Large] Bad domains McAfee study

[Brendler, Beau]

Well, it sounds like .hk took it pretty seriously...

Did Afilias even have a media response?


-----Original Message-----
From: Wendy Seltzer [mailto:wendy at seltzer.com]
Sent: Mon 6/9/2008 3:23 PM
To: Brendler, Beau
Cc: At-Large Worldwide
Subject: Re: [At-Large] Bad domains McAfee study
 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I'm not Afilias, but I'd tend to say that domain name doesn't equal
content, and a registry is not and should not be responsible for
domains' uses.

I'm not sure this study is any more representative or useful than "older
sites tend to be less infested than newer ones" or "URLs that start with
WWW differ from those that don't."

- --Wendy

Brendler, Beau wrote:
> Thanks, Jaqueline, that's interesting. I'd also be really interested to
> hear Afilias' response to this characterization of .info.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jacqueline A. Morris [mailto:jam at jacquelinemorris.com] 
> Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 1:33 PM
> To: Brendler, Beau
> Cc: At-Large Worldwide
> Subject: Re: [At-Large] Bad domains McAfee study
> 
> Hi Beau
> There's been some discussion on the cc lists about this as you can
> imagine.
> Here's the .hk response to the media:
> 
> We are very surprised to learn about the research findings from McAfee. 
> In fact, in a meeting organized by Anti-Phishing Working Group last week
> in Tokyo Japan, Hong Kong Domain Name Registration (HKDNR) was invited
> to present its best practice in combating suspicious websites. We are
> trying to get in touch with the research author to gain more insights
> into this research and the findings. The research report shows the
> figures and analysis of the whole of last year. In particular, the
> report claimed that 9.9 million websites have been tested. It is
> suspected that most of the malicious sites were tested several months
> ago and no long exist.
> 
> HKDNR is committed to providing a safe Internet environment for the
> community and has put in place various measures against suspicious
> websites. We have been working closely with Office of the
> Telecommunications Authority (OFTA), Hong Kong Police and Hong Kong
> Computer Emergency Response Team Coordination Centre (HKCERT) to monitor
> and control the situation. In August last year, in conjunction with the
> list of suspicious domains provided by OFTA, we suspended over 10,000
> domains in regard. Following that initiatives, the situation with '.hk' 
> related suspicious websites has been greatly improved.
> 
> We actively review our systems and domain name registration procedures
> and policies. Particularly, we have more stringent documentary
> requirements to combat suspicious websites registered overseas in order
> to catch up with the fast-changing Internet world. We also want to call
> for the general community to be aware of the issue and report to related
> authorities whenever they have queries accessing a web site.
> 
> 
> Brendler, Beau wrote:
>> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24966835?GT1=43001
>>
>> "McAfee found the most dangerous domains to navigate to are ".hk" 
>> (Hong Kong), ".cn" (China) and ".info" (information)."
>>
>> Apologies if you've seen this already.
>>
>> BB
>>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFITYNEuuui10VsrVERAqc+AJ96GWQ9v+NDJWId5c8LWCLnZopX2gCfbMuT
bnubsA10ZEEcJI2Fcvya3D8=
=q+cj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

***
Scanned