[At-Large] [NA-Discuss] GNSO Improvements Statement Edits

[Evan Leibovitch]

Brendler, Beau wrote:
> I'm closer to supporting this than anything else I've seen yet.
>
> Danny, Evan, what do you think (the document is a little difficult to read as it's very wide, I'm referring to Nick's revisions on the right).
>   
It is a massive step in the right direction, specifically in suggesting
that ALAC may still play a role in GNSO while drafters are aware of its
flowchart-rewriting consequences.

I hope that there are lessons learned going forward -- certainly
mistakes were made to get us to this point -- but on the immediate issue
of "what do we send regarding the GNSO improvements" I like Nick's
draft. Please -- especially amongst those who took issue with the
original "final" versions -- if anyone has suggestions to make please
offer them now.

- Evan