[At-Large] NCUC/ALAC and disappointment

[Izumi AIZU]

2007/11/28, Bret Fausett <bfausett at internet.law.pro>:

> On Nov 27, 2007, at 6:51 AM, Brendler, Beau wrote:
>  > They focused narrowly on a free speech matter. In my
> organization's opinion,
>  > there were a whole range of consumer (i.e., end-user, not domain
> registrant)
>  > issues to be addressed.
>
> Good to have both views articulated though. We could benefit from the
> cross-over. Certainly more users buy stuff on the Internet than
> publish on it, but both views are important to articulate on behalf
> of end users.

I quite agree with this line. In my veiw, NCUC and ALAC/RALO/ALS are
complementaly, not competing, at least directly.

With the result of GNSO Review and also upcoming ALAC review,
as well as Board review, we should not limit our imagination to
just the curresnt status-quo, but I think we should also pay good attention
to the past history which led to the present situation.

izumi