[At-Large] Agenda for ICANN Board Meeting Nov 20

Izumi AIZU iza at anr.org
Thu Nov 15 13:44:02 EST 2007


Thank you Wendy for sharing this.

It seems ALAC Review is not there - is it still at the
BGC's hand to consider,  or did I miss it somewhere?

izumi

2007/11/16, Wendy Seltzer <wendy at seltzer.com>:
> At-Large colleagues,
>
> The ICANN Board will meet telephonically Nov. 20 (21:00 UTC).  Several
> items are up for discussion and possible decision:
>
> 20 November 2007
>
> Special Meeting of the Board
>
>    1. Whois Conflict of National Laws Procedure
>    2. Discussion of .TEL Contractual Amendment
>    3. Redelegation of ccTLD for .BB (Barbados)
>    4. Initiation of Early Awareness Procedures for Global Policy Proposals
>          a. Allocation of Autonomous System Numbers
>          b. Allocation of the remaining IPv4 address space in the
> Regional Internet Registry system
>    5. Update on Czech Arbitration Court UDRP Application
>    6. Contract for Consultant to write RFP for New GTLD Process
>    7. Discussion of progress planning for New gTLD Policy and Implementation
>    8. Updates on Bylaws-Mandated Reviews
>    9. Discussion of President's Report
>   10. Discussion of Internet Governance Forum (IGF)
>   11. Other Business
>
> Many of these are informational updates, from which I will try to report
> back with further detail to the at-large before they are presented for
> decision.
>
> WHOIS and National Laws:
> In Los Angeles, the GAC acknowledged that its member nations were not
> going to reach a uniform recommendation on WHOIS, thus making way for
> the Board to implement the policy on conflicts with national law
> described at
> <http://gnso.icann.org/issues/whois-privacy/whois_national_laws_procedure.htm>.
>
>
> [GAC Communique: "Due to the complexity of this issue related to the
> diversity of national policies and procedures among GAC members the GAC
> does not believe a uniform process is workable and accordingly the
> interim solution from the GAC's San Juan communiqué should be the basis
> of resolving any potential conflict:
> … specific cases should be referred to the relevant national government
> for advice on the authority of the request for derogation from the ICANN
> gTLD WHOIS policy."]
>
> The .tel contract amendment, which has been out for public comment and
> considered under this procedure and others, offers greater privacy
> rights to individual registrants.  Telnic is based in the UK and
> submitted that ICANN's general registry contract conflicted with UK and
> EU data protection law.
>
> Please let me know if you have comments to add on any of these subjects
> or would like additional information.  Please let me know further if
> ALAC has other matters to bring to the Board's attention.
>
> I expect I will not have further to report before the ALAC
> teleconference, as the Board has not met since Los Angeles.
>
> --Wendy
>
>
> --
> Wendy Seltzer -- wendy at seltzer.org
> Visiting Professor, Northeastern University School of Law
> Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society
> http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html
> http://www.chillingeffects.org/
> https://www.torproject.org/
>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
>
> At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org
> ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org


-- 
                        >> Izumi Aizu <<

           Institute for HyperNetwork Society, Oita
           Kumon Center, Tama University, Tokyo
                                  Japan
                                 * * * * *
           << Writing the Future of the History >>
                                www.anr.org




More information about the At-large mailing list