[At-Large] <IMPORTANT> Draft Plan for Tuesday'sAtLarge communitymeeting with ICANN Board

Mon Oct 29 20:40:23 EDT 2007

No – the agenda that we have been discussing all day is the one for
TOMORROW.

Tonight is the joint meeting, with one item added which is the agenda for
TOMORROW approval -  the rest of the agenda for tonight remains the same
AFAIK.

This addition was part of the briefing I got this AM.

I was also told that the Summit wasn’t ready for discussion with the Board.
As this first information I got was corrected by you and Sebastien, it’s on
the draft agenda for the BO that was updated on the wiki per the request
from Hong.

From: Thompson, Darlene [mailto:DThompson at GOV.NU.CA] 
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 17:16
To: jam at jacquelinemorris.com; Bret Fausett; At-Large Global List
Subject: RE: [At-Large] <IMPORTANT> Draft Plan for Tuesday'sAtLarge
communitymeeting with ICANN Board

Ummm... Jacqueline,

Please refer to your agenda.  It is tonight's meeting that was supposed to
be a joint ALAC/Secretariats meeting, not tomorrow's.  That is what I was
refering to.  This joint meeting seems to have been replaced by a planning
meeting for tomorrow.  So be it.  I am fexible enough to bow out to the more
important items.  I got the idea that the Summit was being dismissed from
tomorrows agenda by your postings.  I can't see how they could be taken any
differently.

Darlene

   _____  

From: Jacqueline A. Morris [mailto:jam at jacquelinemorris.com]
Sent: Mon 10/29/2007 7:10 PM
To: Thompson, Darlene; 'Bret Fausett'; 'At-Large Global List'
Subject: RE: [At-Large] <IMPORTANT> Draft Plan for Tuesday'sAtLarge
communitymeeting with ICANN Board

Darlene

I have no idea to what you refer as being railroaded, the first draft as
sent had NO RALO member participation at all. I particularly added ALS names
to presentations for the meeting with the BOARD tomorrow (if you notice,
Didier, Danny have been added, also my first suggestion that we include
issue specialists from the secretariats and ALSes!) – this is the agenda for
that meeting, not for the joint meeting today at 19:00.

I also have no idea where you got the idea that the Summit was dismissed –
Sebastien has sent notes on that, and in the briefing I got today, I was
told that the Secretariats wanted to discuss it   before presenting it - so
the compromise suggestion is there to have a general intro to the Summit
proposal, with space to present it fully when the Secretariats say OK.

I also do not appreciate the aggressive tone at all.

From: Thompson, Darlene [mailto:DThompson at GOV.NU.CA] 
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 15:31
To: jam at jacquelinemorris.com; Bret Fausett; At-Large Global List
Subject: RE: [At-Large] <IMPORTANT> Draft Plan for Tuesday'sAtLarge
communitymeeting with ICANN Board

Jacqueline,

This is the first "joint" meeting of the ALAC and Secretariats and so far
the Secrtariats have been completely left out.  In fact, when we put
something forward it is just dismissed (Summit).  If this session is just
going to be the Secretariats being railroaded by ALAC then I want nothing to
do with it.

Somehow this has gone from a joint meeting to a meeting discussing the
meeting tomorrow.  Fine, but do try to include what the "other half" wants
discussed, too, K?  Elsewise its a bit misleading, don't you think?
Yesterday it was discussed and agreed that we would be presenting on the
Summit and now it seems to be tossed out of the window by one person.  I am
very against this kind of un-transparent process.

Sorry to be negative but I was SO happy at the end of yesterday, thinking
that maybe some of the BS was behind us and that maybe we could all be
productive together and now I see it all starting again.  This is just
getting depressing.

Darlene

   _____  

From: alac-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org on behalf of Jacqueline A. Morris
Sent: Mon 10/29/2007 5:30 PM
To: 'Bret Fausett'; 'At-Large Global List'
Subject: Re: [At-Large] <IMPORTANT> Draft Plan for Tuesday'sAtLarge
communitymeeting with ICANN Board

OK
Here's my take on the agenda now:
Introductions – Jacqueline 5 mins
 - Acknowledgement and introduction for outgoing and incoming ALAC members
 - New members introduction
ALAC in Transition- Veronica – Report on – One day  Workshop - 5 mins
Discussion with Board on the future of ALAC and At Large - 30 mins
Policy issues -
- gNSO improvement and gTLDs – Alan (5 min + discussion 5 min - total 10
min)
- IDNs - Hong, Bilal - 10 min (include IGF, work with GAC and ccNSO)
- IPV4 and IPV6 – Izumi, Didier - 10 min
- Registrar Accreditation Agreements (RAAs), Registry Escrow  -Beau, danny -
10 min
- Bylaws change (brief mention and any questions from Board before they get
to it in their meeting) - Jacqueline ; Cheryl - 5 mins max
- Budget- Cheryl and Annette - 15 mins total

This takes us to about  100 min, leaving 20 min for flexibility - e.g. late
arrival of Board members(happens a lot as they have to do many meetings) as
well as some flexibility to increase discussion time on issues that may turn
out to need more time.

-----Original Message-----
From: Bret Fausett [HYPERLINK
"mailto:bfausett at internet.law.pro"mailto:bfausett at internet.law.pro]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 14:19
To: At-Large Global List
Subject: Re: [At-Large] <IMPORTANT> Draft Plan for Tuesday's AtLarge
communitymeeting with ICANN Board

I agree with this as well. A significant portion of the meeting should be
open for a more flexible discussion of the status and future of the ALAC.

      Bret

> agree with Siavash
> that we should include a visioning issue as well.

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.12/1096 - Release Date: 10/27/2007
11:02

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.12/1096 - Release Date: 10/27/2007
11:02

_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list
ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
HYPERLINK
"http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.or
g"http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.o
rg

At-Large Official Site: HYPERLINK
"http://www.alac.icann.org/"http://www.alac.icann.org
ALAC Independent: HYPERLINK
"http://www.icannalac.org/"http://www.icannalac.org 

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.12/1096 - Release Date: 10/27/2007
11:02

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.12/1096 - Release Date: 10/27/2007
11:02

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.12/1096 - Release Date: 10/27/2007
11:02

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.12/1096 - Release Date: 10/27/2007
11:02

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: winmail.dat
Type: application/ms-tnef
Size: 11954 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/at-large_atlarge-lists.icann.org/attachments/20071029/629c1b34/attachment.bin 