[At-Large] <IMPORTANT> Draft Plan forTuesday'sAtLarge communitymeeting with ICANN Board

Mon Oct 29 19:27:27 EDT 2007

Dear Darlene,

I agree that Summit is an important issue.

I would like to remind you and the all community, that this was first
discusses on the ALAC conf call the 12 June 2007.

See: HYPERLINK
"https://st.icann.org/alac/index.cgi?transcription_12_june_2007"https://st.i
cann.org/alac/index.cgi?transcription_12_june_2007

Extract

“Sebastien: I would like to make one suggestion, Sebastien about the
spending money from At-Large. We, it seems that each meeting the goal is to
have one or two RALO coming and the ALAC member coming, that’s by ICANN. I
would like to suggest that we study the possibility to have during one
meeting per year, or one meeting each one-and-a-half year, all the RALO
coming together at the same place. I think it could be a very good
improvement to share and to know each other and let the RALO know each
other. 

Nick: I’d love to propose that guys. To be honest with you, I’d love to. Or,
rather, I’d love to support you proposing it. 

Female: Like a real General Assembly? 

Nick: Yeah, I would love it. 

Alan: Are you saying in addition to coming when people are in the region, or
instead of? 

Nick: I would like to see

Alan: No, I was asking the original proposer. 

Sebastien: It’s Sebastien. In addition, I think let’s imagine that as it
will be in Los Angeles next time, that we have every RALO, one people from
each ALSes coming to the Los Angeles meeting. And it will not prevent people
coming this time from North America and South America and the next meeting
it will be in Africa. I don’t know the RALO of Africa will meet and the next
one, and so on. But to have one meeting each year or year-and-a-half – we
have to discuss that – all the RALO coming together. 

Male: All the RALOs or all the ALSes? 

Female: All the ALSes. 

Sebastien: All the ALSes of all the RALOs.

Female: That would be, at the moment, ninety something people. 

Cheryl: And who knows at what point that would level off.

”

I still support the idea and we need to discuss this issue.

There are different ideas ones developed by our colleagues of NARalo and
ones I developed.

We need to find together the best way to succeed in pursuing that objective
to have this Summit organise during the next European Icann meeting (Paris).

Please find the different doc:

“The details that have been done to date are on the ICANNWiki at HYPERLINK
"http://www.icannwiki.org/index.php/At-Large_Global_Summit"http://www.icannw
iki.org/index.php/At-Large_Global_Summit

and something resembling a summit outline is at HYPERLINK
"http://www.icannwiki.org/index.php/ICANN_Ensemble"http://www.icannwiki.org/
index.php/ICANN_Ensemble

-          Evan »

And attached

All the best

Sébastien Bachollet

Président

HYPERLINK "mailto:sebastien.bachollet at isoc.fr"sebastien.bachollet at isoc.fr

HYPERLINK "http://www.egeni.org"www.egeni.org

HYPERLINK "http://www.isoc.fr"www.isoc.fr

   _____  

De : alac-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
[mailto:alac-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] De la part de Thompson,
Darlene
Envoyé : lundi 29 octobre 2007 23:31
À : jam at jacquelinemorris.com; Bret Fausett; At-Large Global List
Objet : Re: [At-Large] <IMPORTANT> Draft Plan forTuesday'sAtLarge
communitymeeting with ICANN Board

Jacqueline,

This is the first "joint" meeting of the ALAC and Secretariats and so far
the Secrtariats have been completely left out.  In fact, when we put
something forward it is just dismissed (Summit).  If this session is just
going to be the Secretariats being railroaded by ALAC then I want nothing to
do with it.

Somehow this has gone from a joint meeting to a meeting discussing the
meeting tomorrow.  Fine, but do try to include what the "other half" wants
discussed, too, K?  Elsewise its a bit misleading, don't you think?
Yesterday it was discussed and agreed that we would be presenting on the
Summit and now it seems to be tossed out of the window by one person.  I am
very against this kind of un-transparent process.

Sorry to be negative but I was SO happy at the end of yesterday, thinking
that maybe some of the BS was behind us and that maybe we could all be
productive together and now I see it all starting again.  This is just
getting depressing.

Darlene

   _____  

From: alac-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org on behalf of Jacqueline A. Morris
Sent: Mon 10/29/2007 5:30 PM
To: 'Bret Fausett'; 'At-Large Global List'
Subject: Re: [At-Large] <IMPORTANT> Draft Plan for Tuesday'sAtLarge
communitymeeting with ICANN Board

OK
Here's my take on the agenda now:
Introductions – Jacqueline 5 mins
 - Acknowledgement and introduction for outgoing and incoming ALAC members
 - New members introduction
ALAC in Transition- Veronica – Report on – One day  Workshop - 5 mins
Discussion with Board on the future of ALAC and At Large - 30 mins
Policy issues -
- gNSO improvement and gTLDs – Alan (5 min + discussion 5 min - total 10
min)
- IDNs - Hong, Bilal - 10 min (include IGF, work with GAC and ccNSO)
- IPV4 and IPV6 – Izumi, Didier - 10 min
- Registrar Accreditation Agreements (RAAs), Registry Escrow  -Beau, danny -
10 min
- Bylaws change (brief mention and any questions from Board before they get
to it in their meeting) - Jacqueline ; Cheryl - 5 mins max
- Budget- Cheryl and Annette - 15 mins total

This takes us to about  100 min, leaving 20 min for flexibility - e.g. late
arrival of Board members(happens a lot as they have to do many meetings) as
well as some flexibility to increase discussion time on issues that may turn
out to need more time.

-----Original Message-----
From: Bret Fausett [HYPERLINK
"mailto:bfausett at internet.law.pro"mailto:bfausett at internet.law.pro]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2007 14:19
To: At-Large Global List
Subject: Re: [At-Large] <IMPORTANT> Draft Plan for Tuesday's AtLarge
communitymeeting with ICANN Board

I agree with this as well. A significant portion of the meeting should be
open for a more flexible discussion of the status and future of the ALAC.

      Bret

> agree with Siavash
> that we should include a visioning issue as well.

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.12/1096 - Release Date: 10/27/2007
11:02

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.12/1096 - Release Date: 10/27/2007
11:02

_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list
ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
HYPERLINK
"http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.or
g"http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.o
rg

At-Large Official Site: HYPERLINK
"http://www.alac.icann.org/"http://www.alac.icann.org
ALAC Independent: HYPERLINK
"http://www.icannalac.org/"http://www.icannalac.org 

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.12/1096 - Release Date: 27/10/2007
11:02

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.12/1096 - Release Date: 27/10/2007
11:02

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/at-large_atlarge-lists.icann.org/attachments/20071030/cca12457/attachment.html 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: SBTideas_V0.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 37376 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/at-large_atlarge-lists.icann.org/attachments/20071030/cca12457/attachment.doc 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ICANN Ensemble.doc
Type: application/msword
Size: 87040 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/at-large_atlarge-lists.icann.org/attachments/20071030/cca12457/attachment-0001.doc 