[At-Large] <IMPORTANT> Draft Plan for Tuesday's AtLargecommunity meeting with ICANN Board

[Nguyen Thu Hue]

I do agree that having a focus dialouge is better.  the two hours meeting
with the board should be equally allocated time for technical and proceses
issues. although i have just one day physically with ALAC, i strongly see
that proceses if given enough attention will ensure the technical inputs
from alac work. 

As a dialouge type of meeting, so one to lead the topic be clear to give
what is major things done by the alac in this regard, what major things yet
the alac to be working on in which time manner and make rooms for the board
inputs. to avoid duplication with all technical meetings that happen around
and the board may have been hearing, we need to make the ALAC spirit. 

 It is better to have those who are clear with their issue and have Fact to
tell be chosen.

Hue 



-----Original Message-----
From: alac-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
[mailto:alac-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org] On Behalf Of Izumi AIZU
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 1:59 AM
To: Wendy Seltzer
Cc: At-Large
Subject: Re: [At-Large] <IMPORTANT> Draft Plan for Tuesday's
AtLargecommunity meeting with ICANN Board

I have just spoke with Jacqueline, and she feels that having all
topics within around 90 minutes, may not be feasible and try
to focus on 2 or 3 most important topics to discuss with the Board.

I think having focused dialogue is a very good idea, but the challenge
remain as to which 2 or 3 points are "the most important things"
given so many important policy and other issues all around.
I hope we can discuss this in the evening today.

izumi


2007/10/30, Wendy Seltzer <wendy at seltzer.com>:
> Based on feedback from RALO members, I'd like to suggest that we add
> "At-Large Summit" as a separate item -- particularly since that's
> proposed as a way to make ALAC's input more than the views of just 15
> individuals.
>
> Perhaps this item fits in under GNSO improvements, since it's also
> talking about making structures more effective.
>
> I'd recommend inviting Evan to present the proposals he has helped to
> spearhead.
>
> Thanks,
> --Wendy
>
> Izumi AIZU wrote:
> > Here is the draft plan prepared by Annette, Alan, Wendy, Beau and
> > Izumi this morning.
> >
> > Please read them carefully, and if your name is listed, then you are
> > assigned a task for that.Don't miss it!!
> >
> > If you have additional topics to be discussed or any suggestions on
> > how to operate this meeting, please send them to this list as soon as
> > possible. We like to let ALL members of ALAC to speak up, but be
> > mindful for the time allocations.
> >
> > Jacqueline to Chair the meeting, Izumi assist Jacqueline as time-keeper
> >
> > Introduction - Jacqueline
> > Acknowledgement and introduction for outgoing and incoming ALAC members
> > New members introduction - what they expect to do
> > RALO-elect ALAC members and NomCom-select ALAC members to say a few
> > words, 2 min max      [10 - 15 min?]
> >
> > ALAC in Transition- Veronica/Cheryl - 3 min max
> > Report on - One day Workshop
> >
> >
> > Policy Areas - share ALAC views*
> >
> > *"ALAC" here means the collective voices with ALS and RALO community,
> > not only 15-members.
> >
> > Followings are the list of topics and "speakers" who are responsible
> > to prepare the draft sentences, hopefully in one or two paragraphs max
> > this afternoon, circulate them online - to the open list - and the
> > compile/edit them.
> >
> > They will be the speakers on the subject at the meeting to introduce
them.
> > If other members have additional comments, dissenting opinions, they
> > are free to add - within limited timeframe.
> > The Board may ask questions to us, or we may ask their opinions as a
> > two-way dialogue.
> >
> > 1.    New gTLDs - Wendy and Beau
> > 2.    gNSO improvement - Alan
> > 3.    Domain tasting, Domain name front running  - Robert
> > 4.    geoTLDs -  Annette
> > 5.    WHOIS - Wendy
> > 6.    IDNs - Hong - Annette
> > 7.    IPV4 and IPV6 - Izumi
> > 8.    Registrar Accreditation Agreements (RAAs), Registry Escrow  - Beau
> > 9.    ccNSO issue area-  Siavash
> > 10.   ALAC Review - Robert
> >
> > ALAC Operations issues
> > 1.    Bylaws changes, outreach plan - Alice and Mohamed ? (Robert to
contact them)
> > 2.    Budgets- Cheryl and Annette
> > 3.    introducing the Secretariat  (to be discussed tonight on how to)
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > izumi
> > --
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > ALAC mailing list
> > ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> >
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
> >
> > At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org
> > ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Wendy Seltzer -- wendy at seltzer.org
> phone: +1.914.374.0613 // office: 617.373.7331
> Visiting Professor, Northeastern University School of Law
> Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society
> http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html
> http://www.chillingeffects.org/
> https://www.torproject.org/
>
>


-- 
                        >> Izumi Aizu <<

           Institute for HyperNetwork Society, Oita
           Kumon Center, Tama University, Tokyo
                                  Japan
                                 * * * * *
           << Writing the Future of the History >>
                                www.anr.org

_______________________________________________
ALAC mailing list
ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org

At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org
ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org