[At-Large] [NA-Discuss] Results of the Voting for ALAC NominatingCommittee 2008 Appointments

[Danny Younger]

Ross,

This has never been an issue about "you".

Registrars put their own registrar candidates onto the
NonCom.  Registries put their own candidates onto the
NonCom.  Every stakeholder group looks to safeguard
their own interests by selecting member
representatives from their own community to serve on
the NonCom.

Apparently, the ALAC is not that bright.

As far as I am concerned, you and Desiree Milosevic
hail from the supplier camp and ultimately the both of
you will likely wind up selecting board directors that
favor suppliers over users.

By the way, your own registrar constituency is now
holding an election to determine their NonCom
representative... will you also be running for that
seat?

--- Ross Rader <ross at tucows.com> wrote:

> Danny Younger wrote:
> > Wendy,
> > 
> > You are correct.  Matters were left to the
> complete
> > discretion of the ALAC, the champion of the user
> > interest, that in its wisdom elected the best
> possible
> > user representatives from the registry and
> registrar
> > communities.  
> > 
> > Perhaps next year you can elect VeriSign's Chuck
> Gomes
> > to serve as your user representative.
> 
> Danny - please stop repeating this. You've said it
> many times and its 
> really starting to bother me. I think I've offered a
> fair explanation of 
> how I will be spending my time in the next few years
> and that I should 
> be given a chance to participate, as a user.
> 
> This was never an issue when you were in the employ
> of register.com, why 
> are you making it an issue now? I understand that
> you have issues about 
> the process, but I really don't understand why you
> are making it an 
> issue about me.
> 
> -ross
> 



      ____________________________________________________________________________________
Shape Yahoo! in your own image.  Join our Network Research Panel today!   http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7