[At-Large] [RAA-WG] Fourth possibly final draft of RAA comments

[John L]

>> I didn't object, but I don't think it's an important point, either.  I 
>> actively oppose any language that tells ICANN to enforce privacy laws. 
>> That's the job of governments, not of ICANN.
>> 
>> ICANN: "We're sanctioning you for violating law X."
>> 
>> Registrar: "We didn't violate law X, and besides, it doesn't apply to us."
>
> Actually, we are not talking just about laws, but about whatever privacy 
> policy ICANN might have.

That's fine, but I am still completely opposed to anything that suggests 
that it's ICANN's job to enforce the law.

> If the new ALAC position is that breaches to privacy rights of the 
> registrants are irrelevant and should not be contrasted by ICANN, I would 
> like that to be said clearly.

My position is since about 99.99% of at-large users have never registered 
a domain and never will, their interest should be most important to us.

R's,
John