[At-Large] [RAA-WG] Fourth possibly final draft of RAA comments

[Danny Younger]

John,

Thanks for the whack.  In reviewing my notes, I also
spotted an interesting recommendation from Randy
Glass, namely "to add, there should be a 3rd party
representative, like an ombudsman within
ICANN that could handle a registrant's inter-registrar
problems."

The notion of a registrant liaison with adjudicating
powers is a good one.  Perhaps this could be put
forward as a recommendation.


--- John L <johnl at iecc.com> wrote:

> I took another whack.  Other than fixing lots of
> typos, main changes are:
> 
> - beginning clarifies that this is from the RAA WG
> 
> - added the beneficiary language bullet from Bret
> 
> - removed transfer timeout language, since it
> already does that
> 
> - added a few words to acknowledge things ICANN
> already (at least in 
> theory) does
> 
> I didn't reinstate the WHOIS privacy stuff since I
> saw only one comment 
> asking for it.  But the section on resellers does
> say that registrars 
> should have contracts that pass through all
> registrant responsibilities, 
> which covers the most important point, I think.
> 
> Regards,
> John Levine, johnl at iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator of
> "The Internet for Dummies",
> Information Superhighwayman wanna-be,
> http://www.johnlevine.com, ex-Mayor
> "More Wiener schnitzel, please", said Tom,
revealingly.>
_______________________________________________
> RAA-WG mailing list
> RAA-WG at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/raa-wg_atlarge-lists.icann.org
> 
> RAA WG Online:
>
https://st.icann.org/alac/index.cgi?registrant_registrar_relations
> 



       
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who knows. Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/?link=list&sid=396545469