[At-Large] Proposal: Rotating Chair for ALAC

[Nick Ashton-Hart]

Bret, an election for the Chair of ALAC isn't optional - see the  
ICANN Bylaws, Article XI,S2(4)(d):

"The Chair of the ALAC shall be elected by the members of the ALAC  
pursuant to procedures adopted by the Committee."

If the objective you seek is that more than one face is 'seen', that  
could certainly be achieved by having one of the ALAC from the region  
act as the spokesperson for the community at the ICANN meetings - at  
public fora, etc - without requiring multiple annual elections of the  
chair...


On 9 Jul 2007, at 17:00, Bret Fausett wrote:

> My proposal didn't envision elections. Only three people are
> involved, so public campaigning, lobbying, and voting won't happen.
> If three reasonable people of good will can't agree, then they can go
> into a closet and do rock-paper-scissors until a winner emerges. Or
> they can share the Chair.
>
> Personally, I don't agree that the ALAC needs a single face, a single
> voice, a single person as a point of contact. Yes, we probably need a
> single email address -- ALAC-Chair at icann.org or something -- but the
> recipients of that email address should be the rotating Executive
> Committee, not one person. I think we will benefit, both functionally
> and in the eyes of the community, from being an organization with
> many voices, many faces, and both a real and perceived ability to
> work together in a relatively flat organizational structure that
> doesn't elevate any one person above the others.
>
>                Bret
>
> On Jul 9, 2007, at 8:32 AM, Nick Ashton-Hart wrote:
>
>> With respect to this proposal, perhaps as the staff I could comment
>> on the idea from the perspective of administrative overhead, and also
>> perception outside the community:
>>
>> Firstly, if the chair changes that often, you will have to have some
>> way to select between the three regional representatives where more
>> than one of them is willing to serve. This means more elections.
>> Elections cause a fair amount of administrative overhead, and
>> generally involve campaigning, lobbying others for votes, etc. This
>> takes away time from policy discussions and other substantive work.
>>
>> Secondly, as everyone is well aware, after spending years in
>> procedural discussions and forming RALOs, those stakeholders outside
>> of At-Large are very much looking to see how much policy work the
>> community does. Having just finished forming all the structures, do
>> you think that those outside of At-Large will see it as a good sign
>> that you are turning immediately to desiging more administrative
>> processes which involve elections?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge- 
> lists.icann.org
>
> At-Large Official Site: http://www.alac.icann.org
> ALAC Independent: http://www.icannalac.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/at-large_atlarge-lists.icann.org/attachments/20070709/be9a16ba/attachment.html