[At-Large] [NA-Discuss] Budget provisions relating to Domain Tasting
Alan Greenberg
alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Sun Jul 8 15:18:43 EDT 2007
At 07/07/2007 01:48 PM, you wrote:
>Alan Greenberg posted the following comment on 27
>June:
>>
>>"The ALAC requests that ICANN consider charging
>>registrars part or all of the $0.22 fee for names
>>deleted during the AGP."
>http://forum.icann.org/lists/budget-0708/msg00001.html
>
>Sorry to say, that I cannot find the minutes of the
>meeting in which this decision was agreed upon, nor
>can I find a recording of the San Juan meeting
>sessions.
>
>How did the ALAC arrive at this particular
>recommendation without the benefit of any on-list
>discussion whatsoever?
>
>What input did the RALOs have
>into the endorsement of this one specific
>recommendation? Why were other viable options not
>endorsed?
>
>Is this an authorized statement? If so, why wasn't it
>issued by the chair?
>
>Some answers would be appreciated.
Based on discussions during the first few days of meetings in San
Juan, it became evident that there *might* be some positive effect of
commenting on the budget prior to its approval which was scheduled
for Friday, June 29th. I brought the suggestion to the ALAC in the
presence of members from two RALO (and whoever else may have been
calling in at the time). The idea was approved (in fact, I think I
remember that there was an outbreak of applause).
I consulted with the ALAC regarding the wording and posted it with
the approval of the chair (who was rather occupied withmany other matters).
The ALAC is empowered to act without consultation when it is
required. The motion had the approval of (I believe all) RALO
appointed ALAC members and I heard no formal or informal complaints
from any ALS's present.
For the record, the entire ICANN proposed budget had been posted for
over a month, and this was the only comment *anyone* made on it -
something I find rather astounding.
Alan
>
>____________________________________________________________________________________
>We won't tell. Get more on shows you hate to love
>(and love to hate): Yahoo! TV's Guilty Pleasures list.
>http://tv.yahoo.com/collections/265
>
>_______________________________________________
>NA-Discuss mailing list
>NA-Discuss at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/na-discuss_atlarge-lists.icann.org
>---
>Draft MoU with ICANN:
>http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_MOU
>
>Draft Operating Principles:
>http://www.icannwiki.org/NA_RALO_OP
>
>Draft Code of Conduct:
>http://www.icannwiki.org/NARALO_Code_of_Conduct
More information about the At-large
mailing list