[At-Large] [NA-Discuss] Reason for NO vote for TelecommunitiesCanada's ALS application

[Jacqueline A. Morris]

What, that we have a non-voting representative on the Board currently or
that Vint said in the meeting - yeah, that might be something good that we
should do - when we brought it up yet again, of course in the context of
over 90 ALS applications (at the time), as opposed to - we deserve it just
because...as we have been doing in the past (and that never got even that
much of a response) .

-----Original Message-----
From: Wendy Seltzer [mailto:wendy at seltzer.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 10:46 PM
To: jam at jacquelinemorris.com
Cc: 'At-Large Worldwide'; 'NA Discuss'
Subject: Re: [NA-Discuss] [At-Large] Reason for NO vote for
TelecommunitiesCanada's ALS application

Jacqueline A. Morris wrote:
> Why would you say that they are ducking the issue of At Large VOTING
> representation on the Board? It's been discussed at the ALAC/Board
meetings
> several times, and in Lisbon we got quite a positive response. We do
> currently have representation on the Board, BTW.

Really?  That's news to me. I'd better tell the voting electorate, since
they won't likely be aware either.

I'll consider it a positive response when we actually see a change in
structure.

--Wendy


-- 
Wendy Seltzer -- wendy at seltzer.org
Visiting Fellow, Oxford Internet Institute
Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html
http://www.chillingeffects.org/

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.7.6/814 - Release Date: 5/21/2007
2:01 PM
 

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
Version: 7.5.467 / Virus Database: 269.7.6/814 - Release Date: 5/21/2007
2:01 PM