[At-Large] ALS lists - why no public archive?

[alice]

Agree, the current ALAC structure does not support individual Internet 
users participation. Not sure the RALO's will either unless there is a 
commitment to truly supporting/ensuring their engagement.

alice




Wendy Seltzer wrote:
> At 08:38 AM 4/9/2007, Adam Peake wrote:
>   
>> I am just trying to understand how the ALAC structure works.
>>
>> ALS have a pretty clear mandate to support
>> "individual Internet users' informed participation in ICANN by
>> distributing to individual constituents/members information on
>> relevant ICANN activities and issues, offering Internet-based
>> mechanisms that enable discussions of one or more of these activities
>> and issues among individual constituents/members, and involving
>> individual constituents/members in relevant ICANN policy development,
>> discussions and decisions."
>> and to be organised around individual participation, etc.
>> <http://alac.icann.org/correspondence/structures-app.htm>
>>
>> Does the current ALAC structure achieve this?
>>     
>
> NO.
>
> --Wendy
> (more later)
>
>
> --
> Wendy Seltzer -- wendy at seltzer.org
> Visiting Assistant Professor of Law, Brooklyn Law School
> Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society
> http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/seltzer.html
> http://www.chillingeffects.org/  
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
>
> www.alac.icann.org
> www.icannalac.org
>
>