[At-Large] ALS lists - why no public archive?
Bret Fausett
bfausett at internet.law.pro
Mon Apr 9 12:25:26 EDT 2007
My impression of the way it works is that ICANN sends the same
periodic notices about participation and comment opportunities to the
designated ALS representative that it sends to everyone in the world
who subscribes to the ICANN Announce list.
What happens when a notice is received by the ALS is completely up to
the ALS. The response typically is one or more of: (1) redistribute
announcement to members; (2) post announcement to web; (3) do nothing
with announcement; (4) engage in policy debate and provide feedback
to ICANN.
As I understand the relationship, based on the typical RALO MOU, the
ALS has a non-enforceable obligation to distribute information from
ICANN. The ALS has no obligation to respond to ICANN, consider the
issues presented or engage in any policy discussion or debate. If the
ALS chooses to respond, ICANN has a non-enforceable obligation to
receive the response.
It's very light-weight. My first impression of the ALSs at work is
that most ALSs will receive and redistribute information but not
engage in anything substantive.
-- Bret
More information about the At-large
mailing list