[At-Large] ICANN Seeks Public Comments on Proposed Terms of Reference for Independent Review of the At-Large Advisory Cmt. (and At-Large structures)

jam at jacquelinemorris.com jam at jacquelinemorris.com
Thu Apr 5 08:17:20 EDT 2007



   I totally agree with you Adam - that's what I'd love to come out of  
the review.

   Franck, the RALO  structure for ALAC was set up a while ago. We  
just got the RALOs going after 3 years, but the review is overdue (per  
Adam's response), so it seems weird, but it's just the timing.

   Jacqueline

   Quoting Adam Peake <ajp at glocom.ac.jp>:

> because ICANN's bylaws require all supporting
> organizations, councils etc to be reviewed on a
> regular basis, and the ALAC structures haven't
> yet been reviewed, and are behind schedule for
> review
> <http://www.icann.org/general/bylaws.htm#IV-4[1]>.
>
> This might be a positive step.  With RALOs in
> place, an outcome might be to allow for more
> direct representation rather than the current
> rather weak and indirect liaison structure.
> Perhaps...
>
> Thanks,
>
> Adam
>
>
> At 9:28 PM +1200 4/5/07, Franck Martin wrote:
>> Why does ICANN set up a new structure with RALOs
>> and then decide to review it, before they even
>> did any work?
>>
>> I'm certainly confused here.
>>
>> On 4/5/07, Denise Michel
>> <<mailto:denise.michel at icann.org>denise.michel at icann.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Dear members of the At-Large community:
>>
>> Please be advised that, on 30 March 2006, ICANN posted for public
>> comments proposed Terms of Reference detailing questions that would
>> guide the independent review of ICANN's At-Large Advisory Committee and
>> global At-Large structures and processes
>> <<http://icann.org/announcements/announcement-2-30mar07.htm>http://icann.org/announcements/announcement-2-30mar07.htm[2]>.
>> The public
>> comment period will conclude on 29 April 2007.  Please send comments to:
>> <<mailto:alac-review-tor at icann.org>alac-review-tor at icann.org>.
>> View comments at:
>> <<http://forum.icann.org/lists/alac-review-tor/>http://forum.icann.org/lists/alac-review-tor/[3]>.
>>
>>
>> --
>> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>> Franck Martin
>> <mailto:franck.martin at gmail.com>franck.martin at gmail.com
>> "Toute connaissance est une réponse à une question"
>> G. Bachelard
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ALAC mailing list
>> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org[4]
>>
>> www.alac.icann.org
>> www.icannalac.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org[5]
>
> www.alac.icann.org
> www.icannalac.org
>

-- 
Jacqueline A. Morris
www.jacquelinemorris.com


Links:
------
[1] http://www.icann.org/general/bylaws.htm#IV-4
[2]  
http://icann.org/announcements/announcement-2-30mar07.htm>http://icann.org/announcements/announcement-2-30mar07.htm
[3]  
http://forum.icann.org/lists/alac-review-tor/>http://forum.icann.org/lists/alac-review-tor/
[4]  
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
[5]  
http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/at-large_atlarge-lists.icann.org/attachments/20070405/daa74644/attachment.html 


More information about the At-large mailing list