[At-Large] ICANN Seeks Public Comments on Proposed Terms of Reference for Independent Review of the At-Large Advisory Cmt. (and At-Large structures)

[Adam Peake]

because ICANN's bylaws require all supporting 
organizations, councils etc to be reviewed on a 
regular basis, and the ALAC structures haven't 
yet been reviewed, and are behind schedule for 
review 
<http://www.icann.org/general/bylaws.htm#IV-4>.

This might be a positive step.  With RALOs in 
place, an outcome might be to allow for more 
direct representation rather than the current 
rather weak and indirect liaison structure. 
Perhaps...

Thanks,

Adam


At 9:28 PM +1200 4/5/07, Franck Martin wrote:
>Why does ICANN set up a new structure with RALOs 
>and then decide to review it, before they even 
>did any work?
>
>I'm certainly confused here.
>
>On 4/5/07, Denise Michel 
><<mailto:denise.michel at icann.org>denise.michel at icann.org> 
>wrote:
>
>Dear members of the At-Large community:
>
>Please be advised that, on 30 March 2006, ICANN posted for public
>comments proposed Terms of Reference detailing questions that would
>guide the independent review of ICANN's At-Large Advisory Committee and
>global At-Large structures and processes
><<http://icann.org/announcements/announcement-2-30mar07.htm>http://icann.org/announcements/announcement-2-30mar07.htm>. 
>The public
>comment period will conclude on 29 April 2007.  Please send comments to:
><<mailto:alac-review-tor at icann.org>alac-review-tor at icann.org>. 
>View comments at:
><<http://forum.icann.org/lists/alac-review-tor/>http://forum.icann.org/lists/alac-review-tor/>.
>
>
>--
>-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>Franck Martin
><mailto:franck.martin at gmail.com>franck.martin at gmail.com
>"Toute connaissance est une réponse à une question"
>G. Bachelard
>
>_______________________________________________
>ALAC mailing list
>ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
>
>www.alac.icann.org
>www.icannalac.org