[At-Large] ICANN Seeks Public Comments on Proposed Terms of Reference for Independent Review of the At-Large Advisory Cmt. (and At-Large structures)

[Franck Martin]

Why does ICANN set up a new structure with RALOs and then decide to review
it, before they even did any work?

I'm certainly confused here.

On 4/5/07, Denise Michel <denise.michel at icann.org> wrote:
>
> Dear members of the At-Large community:
>
> Please be advised that, on 30 March 2006, ICANN posted for public
> comments proposed Terms of Reference detailing questions that would
> guide the independent review of ICANN's At-Large Advisory Committee and
> global At-Large structures and processes
> <http://icann.org/announcements/announcement-2-30mar07.htm>. The public
> comment period will conclude on 29 April 2007.  Please send comments to:
> <alac-review-tor at icann.org>. View comments at:
> <http://forum.icann.org/lists/alac-review-tor/>.
>
>
-- 
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Franck Martin
franck.martin at gmail.com
"Toute connaissance est une réponse à une question"
G. Bachelard
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/at-large_atlarge-lists.icann.org/attachments/20070405/a4035aae/attachment.html