[At-Large] WHOIS policy

Nick Ashton-Hart nashton at spamcop.net
Fri Feb 9 04:43:11 EST 2007


The public comment period closed 15th January on the report, but it will go
before the Council within a month, and of course Alan the GNSO Liaison and
Wendy of course will be able to make the At-Large community's views known
then.

At some point it will go to the ICANN Board, and a there may or may not be a
public comment opportunity at that time.

On 09/02/07, Thomas Roessler <roessler at does-not-exist.org> wrote:
>
> On 2007-02-08 14:08:55 -0500, Wendy Seltzer wrote:
>
> > Here's the draft report the WHOIS task force is considering
> > <http://forum.icann.org/lists/gnso-dow123/docUOzrntSDL0.doc>
>
> That's a "Not found" here...
>
> > ALAC could submit comments to the Task Force and the GNSO.  (As
> > Danny Younger has noted, there are procedural problems with the
> > PDP's lack of opportunity to consider public comment, as well as
> > substantive problems with the proposals.)
>
> Until when is the thing open for comments, and where can these be
> submitted?  Or is the public comment period closed, and the only
> avenue would be a comment through ALAC's Counci liaison?
>
> (Sorry, but I've pretty thoroughly lost track of these processes... ;)
>
> > Since the debate has changed little since I sent this message in
> > December, I re-send it to spark discussion on this policy issue:
>
> Thanks!
>
> > I have recommended an additional option, that a domain name could
> > be suspended if the registrant did not want to reveal personally
> > identifying information. Enforcement interests (stopping a
> > domain-hosted scam, for example) could be realized even before
> > the registrant was identified, while law enforcement would have
> > all the ordinary tools available to it once it demonstrated there
> > was reason to believe the activity was unlawful.
>
> Strikes me as a pretty reasonable balance; I'd actually suspect that
> this would be better for some enforcement interests than the current
> "exceptional circumstances" proposal.
>
> --
> Thomas Roessler   <roessler at does-not-exist.org>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ALAC mailing list
> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>
> http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac_atlarge-lists.icann.org
>
> www.alac.icann.org
> www.icannalac.org
>



-- 
-- 
Regards,

Nick Ashton-Hart
PO Box 32160
London N4 2XY
United Kingdom
UK Tel: +44 (20) 8800-1011
USA Tel: +1 (202) 657-5460
Fax: +44 (20) 7681-3135
mobile: +44 (7774) 932798
Win IM: ashtonhart at hotmail.com / AIM/iSight: nashtonhart at mac.com / Skype:
nashtonhart
Online Bio:   https://www.linkedin.com/in/ashtonhart
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/at-large_atlarge-lists.icann.org/attachments/20070209/c399e7ff/attachment.html 


More information about the At-large mailing list