<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" /></head><body style='font-size: 11pt; font-family: "Times New Roman",Times,serif'>
<p>Dear Kaili,</p>
<p>To keep the definition as narrow as possible, I see the "need" for regulation "in the public interest" only when there is conflict of interest between the public good/service provider (Rr/Ry) and the user (Registrant).</p>
<p>There might be another good list of reasons for regulation, but in this case, and to make progress in the discussion Carlton proposed, would like to suggest to stick to a narrow and relevant definition of regulation and public interest.</p>
<p>Happy to dicsuss any improvement to a narrow definition of public interest in our case, and avoid Fadi's failure in finding a general one. (RIP)</p>
<div>Best regards</div>
<div>---<br />
<div class="pre" style="margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: monospace">Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez</div>
<div class="pre" style="margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: monospace"><a href="mailto:carlosraul@gutierrez.se">carlosraul@gutierrez.se</a></div>
<div class="pre" style="margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: monospace">+506 8837 7176</div>
<div class="pre" style="margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: monospace">Aparatado 1571-1000</div>
<div class="pre" style="margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: monospace">COSTA RICA<br /> <br /><br /></div>
</div>
<p><br /></p>
<p>El 2018-07-14 09:48, Kan Kaili escribió:</p>
<blockquote type="cite" style="padding: 0 0.4em; border-left: #1010ff 2px solid; margin: 0"><!-- html ignored --><!-- head ignored --><!-- meta ignored -->
<div class="pre" style="margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: monospace">Hi, Julf,<br /> <br /> You have raised a very interesting question. However, according to the attached article of mine, the "public interest" is exactly the consumers/end-users' interest, which is to be represented by At-Large. That is, as long as the govermental regulator is fairly elected by the public.<br /> <br /> Kaili<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ----- Original Message ----- <br /> From: "Johan Helsingius" <<a href="mailto:julf@julf.com">julf@julf.com</a>><br /> To: "ICANN At-Large list" <<a href="mailto:at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org">at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org</a>><br /> Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2018 3:21 PM<br /> Subject: Re: [At-Large] [lac-discuss-en] Vistaprint is abandoning .vista<br /> <br /> <br />
<blockquote type="cite" style="padding: 0 0.4em; border-left: #1010ff 2px solid; margin: 0">On 14-07-18 08:23, Kan Kaili wrote:<br /> <br />
<blockquote type="cite" style="padding: 0 0.4em; border-left: #1010ff 2px solid; margin: 0">● Such a refocus demands redefining the global public interest as the<br /> initiator and driver of<br /> ICANN policy rather than its current status of reactive adviso</blockquote>
<br /> But who defines "global public interest"? Unfortunately the standard<br /> answer tends to be "governments/UN/ITU".<br /> <br /> Julf<br /> _______________________________________________<br /> At-Large mailing list<br /> <a href="mailto:At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org">At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org</a><br /> <a href="https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large</a><br /> <br /> At-Large Official Site: <a href="http://atlarge.icann.org" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://atlarge.icann.org</a></blockquote>
</div>
<br />
<div class="pre" style="margin: 0; padding: 0; font-family: monospace">_______________________________________________<br /> At-Large mailing list<br /> <a href="mailto:At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org">At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org</a><br /> <a href="https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large</a><br /> <br /> At-Large Official Site: <a href="http://atlarge.icann.org" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">http://atlarge.icann.org</a></div>
</blockquote>
</body></html>