<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <p>Thanks for the the compliment.</p>
    <p>Here's a pointer to that note: <br>
    </p>
    <p><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.cavebear.com/archive/rw/igf-democracy-in-internet-governance.pdf">https://www.cavebear.com/archive/rw/igf-democracy-in-internet-governance.pdf</a></p>
    <p>However, among all of the things that I've written about internet
      governance I believe that the following is the most important:</p>
    <p>First Law of the Internet<br>
      <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.cavebear.com/old_cbblog/000059.html">https://www.cavebear.com/old_cbblog/000059.html</a><br>
      <br>
      + Every person shall be free to use the Internet in any way that<br>
        is privately beneficial without being publicly detrimental.<br>
      <br>
         - The burden of demonstrating public detriment shall be on
      those<br>
           who wish to prevent the private use.<br>
      <br>
             - Such a demonstration shall require clear and convincing<br>
               evidence of public detriment.<br>
      <br>
         - The public detriment must be of such degree and extent as<br>
           to justify the suppression of the private activity.</p>
    <p><br>
    </p>
    <p>            --karl--<br>
    </p>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 7/14/18 7:50 AM, Carlton Samuels
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAOZQb9QWz4mitbYg9MeM-8a6PvFHhtG8JRKSrY3fAkGmL-ayMg@mail.gmail.com">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div class="gmail_default"
          style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif;font-size:large">So happy
          to see you in this conversation Karl. </div>
        <div class="gmail_default"
          style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif;font-size:large"><br>
        </div>
        <div class="gmail_default"
          style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif;font-size:large">For
          those who don't know Karl Auerbach, my first deep dive into
          the ICANN phenomenon found me reading Karl Auerbach and
          Michael Froomkin. Over the years since 2007, I've had several
          conversations with Karl on numerous topics. Those interactions
          have always been illuminating and thought-provoking.   </div>
        <div class="gmail_default"
          style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif;font-size:large"><br>
        </div>
        <div class="gmail_default"
          style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif;font-size:large">For
          those of you who might wish to deepen your understanding of
          the ICANN phenomenon, I would also recommend Auerbach's paper
          "Stakeholderism - The Wrong Road for Internet Governance". </div>
        <div class="gmail_default"
          style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif;font-size:large"><br>
        </div>
        <div class="gmail_default"
          style="font-family:tahoma,sans-serif;font-size:large">-Carlton </div>
        <div>
          <div dir="ltr" class="m_-1732988092014321675gmail_signature"
            data-smartmail="gmail_signature">
            <div dir="ltr">
              <div>
                <div dir="ltr">
                  <div><br>
                    ==============================<br>
                    <i><font face="comic sans ms, sans-serif">Carlton A
                        Samuels</font></i><br>
                    <font face="comic sans ms, sans-serif"><i>Mobile:
                        876-818-1799<br>
                        <font color="#33CC00">Strategy, Process,
                          Governance, Assessment & Turnaround</font></i></font><br>
                    =============================</div>
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>
          </div>
        </div>
        <br>
      </div>
      <br>
      <div class="gmail_quote">
        <div dir="ltr">On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 9:51 PM Karl Auerbach
          <<a href="mailto:karl@cavebear.com" target="_blank"
            moz-do-not-send="true">karl@cavebear.com</a>> wrote:<br>
        </div>
        <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
          .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
          Carlton, you are as sane and clear eyed as you have always
          been.  Yes, <br>
          ICANN quacks like a regulatory body and walks like a
          regulatory body.<br>
          <br>
          (Which I guess means that ICANN is a duck?)<br>
          <br>
          I agree with you that ICANN regulates - it controls,
          allocates, revokes, <br>
          and levies fees.  It also shares some other attributes with
          regulatory <br>
          bodies: It is effectively unavoidable and its decisions have
          ripples <br>
          that go far beyond those whose actions are directly shaped by
          the body.<br>
          <br>
          As Even L. pointed out ICANN may have legal reasons to try to
          fend away <br>
          the word "regulator".  That's not surprising, but that kind of
          wordplay <br>
          is approaching an exercise of Orwellian Newspeak.  And it's
          nothing new <br>
          to ICANN: back in year 2000 they tried to label a thing that
          was clearly <br>
          an "election" as something else called a "selection" in an
          attempt to <br>
          evade California laws regarding the obligations of
          non-profit/public <br>
          benefit corporations.<br>
          <br>
          One has to wonder why are intelligent people so afraid to use
          a <br>
          description that so clearly applies?<br>
          <br>
          Well, perhaps it is because there is fear of that word
          reviving a long <br>
          unanswered question.<br>
          <br>
          As you mention, ICANN shapes internet domain name policies and
          <br>
          economics, and even charges "fees" that everyone would agree
          would be <br>
          called "taxes" if levied by a governmental body.<br>
          <br>
          A better way to put this is to say that ICANN restrains some
          trade and <br>
          encourages other trade.  I used that former phrase because it
          tends to <br>
          raise the question of "what provides ICANN with immunity from
          anti-trust <br>
          laws"?<br>
          <br>
          This paper from year 2003 still remains largely unanswered: <br>
          <a
href="http://osaka.law.miami.edu/%7Efroomkin/articles/icann-antitrust.pdf"
            rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://osaka.law.miami.edu/~froomkin/articles/icann-antitrust.pdf</a><br>
          <br>
          By-the-way, with regard to the vistaprint TLD and the
          discussion of <br>
          ICANN application fees - I went through the round a few years
          ago and <br>
          did the better part of 100 applications, with each being an
          almost <br>
          identical application with only a couple of pages of different
          marketing <br>
          info.  Yet we got hit with the full $185,000 charge for each
          one of <br>
          those even though the review for each was essentially
          identical.  It <br>
          made me feel that as between ICANN and a highway robber saying
          "stand <br>
          and deliver" that the latter was less blameworthy.<br>
          <br>
                  --karl--<br>
          <br>
          <br>
          <br>
          On 07/13/2018 05:44 PM, Carlton Samuels wrote:<br>
          > It really isn't a personal opinion; the facts are
          undeniable by virtue <br>
          > of the admitted regulatory signs.<br>
          > <br>
          > It is in ICANN's power to gift a resource, set the
          requirements by which <br>
          > one can be gifted, set the rules for use of resource,
          charge and punish <br>
          > violations of the rules as appropriate and exact a fee
          for gifting that <br>
          > resource.  Anywhere else in Christendom and the known
          sensate world, <br>
          > those activities are the very definition of a regulator.<br>
          > <br>
          > ICANN has managed to convince itself and would wish to
          make <br>
          > accommodating idiots of the rest of us because it is
          politically <br>
          > difficult to do otherwise. I get the politics of it. But
          to ask me to <br>
          > deny the evidence of my two lying eyes and what is
          plainly the case in <br>
          > reason and judgment is a bridge too far. The Christian
          bible has a line <br>
          > in it "in Christ all things are possible". I would add a
          caution to that <br>
          > declaration:  Save and except to take me for an idiot.<br>
          > <br>
          > -Carlton<br>
          > <br>
          > ==============================<br>
          > /Carlton A Samuels/<br>
          > /Mobile: 876-818-1799<br>
          > Strategy, Process, Governance, Assessment &
          Turnaround/<br>
          > =============================<br>
          > <br>
          > <br>
          > On Fri, Jul 13, 2018 at 4:13 PM Kan Kaili <<a
            href="mailto:kankaili@gmail.com" target="_blank"
            moz-do-not-send="true">kankaili@gmail.com</a> <br>
          > <mailto:<a href="mailto:kankaili@gmail.com"
            target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">kankaili@gmail.com</a>>>
          wrote:<br>
          > <br>
          >     Indeed Goran has said "ICANN is not a regulator" many
          times.  I have<br>
          >     heard him saying that myself.  However, this is
          something I disagree<br>
          >     with him.<br>
          > <br>
          >     Again, in my personal opinion, as long as the
          positioning of ICANN<br>
          >     stays blurry as it is now, the confusion will only
          accumulate until<br>
          >     it creats a crisis.<br>
          > <br>
          >     Kaili<br>
          > <br>
          > <br>
          > <br>
          >     ----- Original Message -----<br>
          >     From: "Johan Helsingius" <<a
            href="mailto:julf@julf.com" target="_blank"
            moz-do-not-send="true">julf@julf.com</a> <mailto:<a
            href="mailto:julf@julf.com" target="_blank"
            moz-do-not-send="true">julf@julf.com</a>>><br>
          >     To: <<a
            href="mailto:at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org"
            target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org</a><br>
          >     <mailto:<a
            href="mailto:at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org"
            target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">at-large@atlarge-lists.icann.org</a>>><br>
          >     Sent: Friday, July 13, 2018 8:33 PM<br>
          >     Subject: Re: [At-Large] [lac-discuss-en] Vistaprint
          is abandoning .vista<br>
          > <br>
          > <br>
          >      > On 12-07-18 19:56, Kan Kaili wrote:<br>
          >      >> In my opinion, ICANN should play the role
          of a regulator.<br>
          >      ><br>
          >      > Our esteemed CEO, Göran Marby, has a number of
          phrases he repeats<br>
          >      > fairly often. "ICANN is not a regulator" is one
          of them.<br>
          >      ><br>
          >      > Julf<br>
          >      ><br>
          >      > _______________________________________________<br>
          >      > At-Large mailing list<br>
          >      > <a
            href="mailto:At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org"
            target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org</a><br>
          >     <mailto:<a
            href="mailto:At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org"
            target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org</a>><br>
          >      > <a
            href="https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large"
            rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large</a><br>
          >      ><br>
          >      > At-Large Official Site: <a
            href="http://atlarge.icann.org" rel="noreferrer"
            target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://atlarge.icann.org</a><br>
          >     _______________________________________________<br>
          >     At-Large mailing list<br>
          >     <a href="mailto:At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org"
            target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org</a><br>
          >     <mailto:<a
            href="mailto:At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org"
            target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org</a>><br>
          >     <a
            href="https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large"
            rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large</a><br>
          > <br>
          >     At-Large Official Site: <a
            href="http://atlarge.icann.org" rel="noreferrer"
            target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://atlarge.icann.org</a><br>
          > <br>
          > <br>
          > <br>
          > _______________________________________________<br>
          > At-Large mailing list<br>
          > <a href="mailto:At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org"
            target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org</a><br>
          > <a
            href="https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large"
            rel="noreferrer" target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large</a><br>
          > <br>
          > At-Large Official Site: <a
            href="http://atlarge.icann.org" rel="noreferrer"
            target="_blank" moz-do-not-send="true">http://atlarge.icann.org</a><br>
          > <br>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>