<div dir="ltr">Olivier, <div><br></div><div>I got from Thomas's email that he proposes that we go outside of current norms and create a multistakeholder treaty model that incorporates all our stakeholder groups. Of course it doesn't exist now but we are in a transition phase so perhaps its timely.</div><div><br></div><div>Maureen</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ocl@gih.com" target="_blank">ocl@gih.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Dear Thomas,<br>
<span class=""><br>
On 09/04/2016 20:51, Thomas Lowenhaupt wrote:<br>
><br>
> Perhaps I'm missing something, but isn't Parminder's thought<br>
> bottom-up, and in-line with the multi-stakeholder concept? (And I see<br>
> some merit in his concerns about gTLD governance.)<br>
<br>
</span>The Treaty Model which Parminder argues for requires signature from UN<br>
Member States.<br>
<a href="http://www.un.org/en/member-states/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://www.un.org/en/member-states/</a><br>
<br>
Where is Civil Society?<br>
Where are End Users?<br>
Where are the Technical & Academic Communities?<br>
Where is the Private Sector?<br>
<br>
Kindest regards,<br>
<br>
Olivier<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
At-Large mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org">At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large</a><br>
<br>
At-Large Official Site: <a href="http://atlarge.icann.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://atlarge.icann.org</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>