<p dir="ltr">Sent from my LG G4<br>
Kindly excuse brevity and typos<br>
On 27 Mar 2016 17:31, "Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond" <<a href="mailto:ocl@gih.com">ocl@gih.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
><br>
> In one sentence: if a new organisation oversees ICANN, who oversees the<br>
> new steward?<br>
><br>
SO: Which was simply the question I asked in my previous post of the thread. It was one of the questions that also "rightly" killed the idea during CWG proposal development. Although Parminder is not convinced about that (based on the response to my mail), I guess we must not all necessarily have to agree. (I ofcourse experience that as well, so it's normal and perhaps healthy).</p>
<p dir="ltr">Cheers!</p>
<p dir="ltr">> Kindest regards,<br>
><br>
> Olivier<br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> At-Large mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org">At-Large@atlarge-lists.icann.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large">https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large</a><br>
><br>
> At-Large Official Site: <a href="http://atlarge.icann.org">http://atlarge.icann.org</a><br>
</p>