<p dir="ltr">Yes ... the moratorium idea is starting to gain traction.</p>
<p dir="ltr">Olivier's link relates to another gTLD issue waiting for comments from At Large.</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On 21/09/2015 11:43 pm, "Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond" <<a href="mailto:ocl@gih.com">ocl@gih.com</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<br>
<br>
<div>On 22/09/2015 09:13, Evan Leibovitch
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:trebuchet ms,sans-serif">Having said this, I personally believe that there
should be a moratorium of <b>any</b> new gTLD applications
until a full evaluation of the effect of the current expansion
is complete.</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:trebuchet ms,sans-serif"><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Agreed - and there's another process to comment on wrt this topic.<br>
<a href="https://community.icann.org/x/zIdYAw" target="_blank">https://community.icann.org/x/zIdYAw</a><br>
<br>
Kind regards,<br>
<br>
Olivier<br>
</div>
</blockquote></div>