[At-Large] DomainIncite : Is this why WhatsApp hates some TLDs but not others?

[Roberto Gaetano]

Point taken, Evan.
With the caveat that to inform the user community is a daunting task for which we do not have sufficient resources.

One starting point would be to involve the consumer protection organisations worldwide, but we had little success so far. I remember in the early days of ALAC when I contacted many European consumer protection organisations, getting the same reply from all: “We have far more important things to do”. At that time I thought they were shortsighted, but several years later I have to recognise that they were - and they still probably are - right.

Cheers,
Roberto


> On 13.09.2023, at 23:06, Evan Leibovitch via At-Large <at-large at atlarge-lists.icann.org> wrote:
> 
> Roberto Gaetano wrote:
> 
> I am just saying that At-Large is not the right place where to raise the issue asking for solutions.
> 
> We are fully agreed that this is not At-Large's task to fix.
> I *will*, however, advance that it is At-Large's task to inform. We have an important but sadly neglected role to play in public education.
> 
> There are many issues related to domain names about which people may ask but for which answers are either absent, partial or inaccurate. The most obvious of these is explaining the difference between .co and .com -- that is, how is a ccTLD operationally different from a gTLD. The differences can be non-trivial to both domain consumers and end-users, and are complicated by the way some ccTLDs are marketed by gTLDs. Over the years I have not found an end-user perspective to this issue, only those which inform domain investors.
> 
> "Why are there so many TLDs and why can't I access some of them?", today's topic, is clearly another worthy of some treatment. And maybe someone somewhere can explain the status of the .su TLD.
> 
> We all know that ALAC sits very low on the list of ICANN community parts actually capable of affecting significant change. We're an expense to ICANN rather than a source of revenue, and we lack the economic clout of domain buyers and sellers or the political clout of the GAC.
> 
> That's not going to change any time soon (how's progress on that second At-Large Board seat coming along?) but that's OK. There is still much that we can do to inform end-users (that is, those who wish to be informed) with answers to questions that nobody else seems to be answering, from a perspective unlike any other within ICANN. After all, if we're going to represent the interests of end-users, having them as informed as possible is helpful.
> 
> - Evan
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> At-Large mailing list
> At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
> 
> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/at-large/attachments/20230914/707a9ece/attachment-0001.html>