[At-Large] A brexit problem that I heard about
JJS
jjs at dyalog.net
Mon Aug 20 15:40:05 UTC 2018
Olivier +1.
JJ.
Le 20 août 2018 à 17:22, à 17:22, "Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond" <ocl at gih.com> a écrit:
>Dear Michele,
>
>I never imagined I'd have to defend a registry in a discussion with
>you. :-)
>EuRID engaged with Registrars and clients in the UK even *before* the
>Brexit Referendum so I cannot agree that it is not engaging
>constructively. The rules are clear: you need to be an entity with an
>address in the EU.
>https://eurid.eu/en/register-a-eu-domain/brexit-notice/
>
>The majority vote in the UK has been to leave the EU. Blame the voters
>not EuRID that had clear rules that preceded the UK vote.
>Alternatively,
>open a subsidiary in an EU country and transfer the domain name to it.
>It is not that costly, especially if the domain name is so important.
>Kindest regards,
>
>Olivier
>
>On 20/08/2018 16:20, Michele Neylon - Blacknight wrote:
>>
>> The change isn’t New Year’s eve – it’d be March 2019
>>
>>
>>
>> The issue is that the EC isn’t engaging constructively with
>registrars
>> or our clients, so it’s a total mess.
>>
>>
>>
>> Allowing existing registrants to keep their .eu domains would be the
>> sanest way forward, but the EC doesn’t seem to be willing to discuss
>it.
>>
>>
>>
>> And they’ve also started some insane plan about expanding who can
>> qualify for a .eu domain name without any real thought into how that
>> can be made a reality.
>>
>>
>>
>> Oh the fun
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>>
>> Michele
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Mr Michele Neylon
>>
>> Blacknight Solutions
>>
>> Hosting, Colocation & Domains
>>
>> https://www.blacknight.com/
>>
>> https://blacknight.blog/
>>
>> Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072
>>
>> Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
>>
>> Personal blog: https://michele.blog/
>>
>> Some thoughts: https://ceo.hosting/
>>
>> -------------------------------
>>
>> Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business
>> Park,Sleaty
>>
>> Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland Company No.: 370845
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *At-Large <at-large-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org> on behalf
>> of Roberto Gaetano <roberto_gaetano at hotmail.com>
>> *Date: *Monday 20 August 2018 at 14:35
>> *To: *Danko Jevtović <danko at jevtovic.rs>
>> *Cc: *At-Large Worldwide <at-large at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>> *Subject: *Re: [At-Large] A brexit problem that I heard about
>>
>>
>>
>> Danko,
>>
>> About EURID, I stand corrected, it is the EU who sets the rules.
>EURID
>> only enforces them as operator.
>>
>> I fully agree with you, it is all part of the global package and
>> nobody wants to start showing what the possible compromise points
>will
>> be. The problems, from the operation’s point of view, is that in case
>> of no compromise they have to do the job overnight on New Year’s Eve
>> and that this will happen before the Brexit deadline, so even if a
>> negotiation will be successful in 2019 the TLD changes could have
>been
>> effective already.
>>
>> A big mess, where, as usual, politics dictates and common sense, once
>> again, shows to be far less “common” than we think.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Roberto
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 20.08.2018, at 13:53, Danko Jevtović <danko at jevtovic.rs
>> <mailto:danko at jevtovic.rs>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> I understand that it is not up to EURID, but to EC (European
>> Commission), that hold the contract with EURID to manage to TLDs.
>>
>>
>>
>> The problem seems to be that possible solution (grandfathering
>> clause) cannot be discussed outside of the whole package of
>Brexit
>> negotiations, effectively blocking any reasonable progress.
>>
>>
>>
>> Danko
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* At-Large <at-large-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> <mailto:at-large-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org>> *On Behalf
>> Of *Roberto Gaetano
>> *Sent:* Monday, August 20, 2018 1:09 PM
>> *To:* bzs at theworld.com <mailto:bzs at theworld.com>
>> *Cc:* At Large <at-large at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>> *Subject:* Re: [At-Large] A brexit problem that I heard about
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Barry.
>> You might have a point in principle.
>> However the reality is that each TLD can decide its own rules,
>and
>> therefore whether to be strict in terms of requirements - like
>for
>> instance .bank - or loose - like for instance .com.
>> .eu has chosen the first approach, and has all right to do so.
>> Whether EURID is willing to make an exception for Brexit - based
>> also on the consideration that, as far as I know, they do not
>make
>> continuous checking about whether the resistant still complies
>> with the requirements - or not, I don’t know. Apparently not.
>> Cheers,
>> Roberto
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 17.08.2018, at 19:31, bzs at theworld.com
>> <mailto:bzs at theworld.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Ok I'll say it...
>>
>> How many of these affected *.EU domains were actually
>entities
>> with
>> some sort of EU charter or relationship as the TLD was
>> approved for in
>> 2005?
>>
>> I realize it's naive to point out that .NET was for
>networking
>> organizations and .ORG for not-for-profits etc. in a world
>> where we
>> have .XYZ and .FAIL (must they really be FAILures?)
>>
>> Ok that ship has sailed because no one wanted to enforce it
>as it
>> would interfere with maximazing domain sales in those TLDs.
>>
>> But are we really supposed to get lathered up about those who
>> now got
>> burned flouting all that?
>>
>> What promise do those affected actually expect to be upheld?
>> Chapter
>> and verse not "well, we assumed..."?
>>
>> And, no, marching out one or two bona-fide examples doesn't
>> quite rise
>> to a counter argument.
>>
>> If there were only one or two or ten I'll guess they could be
>> handled
>> since they would have always had a legitimae reason to
>represent
>> themselves with a .EU domain which one would hope would allow
>them
>> some explicit accommodation.
>>
>> --
>> -Barry Shein
>>
>> Software Tool & Die | bzs at TheWorld.com
>>
><mailto:bzs at TheWorld.com> | http://www.TheWorld.com
>> <http://www.theworld.com/>
>> Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: +1 617-STD-WRLD |
>> 800-THE-WRLD
>> The World: Since 1989 | A Public Information Utility | *oo*
>> _______________________________________________
>> At-Large mailing list
>> At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> <mailto:At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
>>
>> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
>> <http://atlarge.icann.org/>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> At-Large mailing list
>> At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> <mailto:At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
>>
>> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> At-Large mailing list
>> At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
>>
>> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>At-Large mailing list
>At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
>
>At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/at-large/attachments/20180820/79eaa113/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the At-Large
mailing list