[At-Large] IDN Variants in the market place

sivasubramanian muthusamy 6.internet at gmail.com
Fri Jul 20 22:24:34 UTC 2018


On Sat, Jul 21, 2018 at 12:08 AM <bzs at theworld.com> wrote:

>
> On July 19, 2018 at 15:48 6.Internet at gmail.com (Sivasubramanian M) wrote:
>  > Please take a look at the attached screenshot of a domainer's offer to
> sell
>  > single character IDNs, for instance an IDN variant (lookalike) of the
> ASCII
>  > character X, which sets a harmful trend. This is an issue if
> confusability.
>
> The general term for this is "homograph attack" or specifically "IDN
> homograph attack", where "attack" may be in the eye of the beholder:
>
>   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IDN_homograph_attack
>
> and has been the subject of much discussion over recent years and
> little resolution.
>
> I believe one popular proposal is browser support which either
> visually flags such IDNs or displays the punycode alongside which is
> an ASCII represenation and should make obvious that this not what one
> might suspect.
>
> For example (from this wikipedia page): xn--bcher-kva.tld indicating
> an umlauted 'u' is in there but importantly that it's not just
> bucher.tld.
>
>   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punycode
>
> There's still the problem with intent. Could I legitimately offer for
> sale the strings with and without the umlaut? I think that's generally
> considered acceptable.
>
> Caveat emptor?
>

Caveat emptor doesn't work.  6.999 out of 7 billion have no clue whatsoever
about Variants.


>
>  >
>  > I understand that the Registries (are required to?) maintain a list of
> harmful
>  > names for their TLDs, but there is no common minimal list of harmful
> names. One
>  > possible way to achieve this is for the Registries, at least in the
> ASCII
>  > space, to volunteer to feed their respective list of harmful names into
> a
>  > common Registry Stakeholder database, and then draw up a common minimum
> list of
>  > harmful domain names that any Registry could avoid registering.
>  >
>  > If At-Large could shape this as a workable suggestion, it could
> formally go to
>  > the Registry Stakeholders.
>  >
>  > Sivasubramanian M
>  > x[DELETED ATTACHMENT Screenshot_20180719-152932~2.png, PNG image]
>  > _______________________________________________
>  > At-Large mailing list
>  > At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>  > https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
>  >
>  > At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
>
> --
>         -Barry Shein
>
> Software Tool & Die    | bzs at TheWorld.com             |
> http://www.TheWorld.com
> Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: +1 617-STD-WRLD       | 800-THE-WRLD
> The World: Since 1989  | A Public Information Utility | *oo*
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/at-large/attachments/20180721/e3f23a9a/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the At-Large mailing list