[At-Large] Auction Proceeds - where we are and what you can help

Fri May 12 18:57:37 UTC 2017

+++1 to Vanda's three!  In my humble view we don't need to be more detailed.

All that now needs thrashing is the evaluation criteria for these.

-Carlton

==============================
*Carlton A Samuels*

*Mobile: 876-818-1799Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment &
Turnaround*
=============================

On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Vanda Scartezini <vanda at scartezini.org>
wrote:

> I totally agree with Eduardo and Carlton. During the call the general idea
> to define objectives was to get more focus . My 3 suggestions written in
> the chat were:
>
> ·         projects to promote knowledge of ICANN,
>
> ·         projects to enlarge DNS industry reaching less developed
> markets
>
> ·         projects to improve technical knowledge
>
>   best regards
>
> here this Sunday will be Mothers’ day
>
>  Here my tribute to all mothers in your lives!
>
>
>
> *Vanda Scartezini*
>
> *Polo Consultores Associados*
>
> *Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004*
>
> *01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil*
>
> *Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 <+55%2011%203266-6253>*
>
> *Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 <+55%2011%2098181-1464> *
>
> *Sorry for any typos. *
>
> *HAPPY 2017!*
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Carlton Samuels <carlton.samuels at gmail.com>
> *Date: *Friday, May 12, 2017 at 3:02 PM
> *To: *Eduardo Diaz <eduardodiazrivera at gmail.com>
> *Cc: *Vanda Scartezini <vanda at scartezini.org>, 'At-Large Worldwide' <
> at-large at atlarge-lists.icann.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [At-Large] Auction Proceeds - where we are and what you
> can help
>
>
>
> I like Ed's outline +1.
>
>
>
> Would only add that In my view, we already have the framework of
> interpretation of ICANN's role!  A lot of time and effort already expended
> defining that for the IANA Transition kerfuffle from which emerged this
> Empowered Community Model.
>
>
>
> Let's resist the inclination to go invent a new wheel
>
>
>
> -Carlton
>
>
>
> ==============================
> *Carlton A Samuels*
>
> *Mobile: 876-818-1799 <(876)%20818-1799> Strategy, Planning, Governance,
> Assessment & Turnaround*
> =============================
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Eduardo Diaz <eduardodiazrivera at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Vanda:
>
>
>
> My comments in RED.
>
>
>
> -ed
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 10:48 AM Vanda Scartezini <vanda at scartezini.org>
> wrote:
>
> Dear colleagues ( Español abajo)
>
>
>
> Auction Proceed CCWG is the group dealing with the process that shall be
> follow for the financial resources from new gTLDs auctions as you remember.
>
> We are in the phase of Auction Proceeds CCWG  where we need to focus on to
> relevant points that your ideas will be very welcome. See below the
> question and if you can comment I appreciate.
>
> We are organizing a framework for this work,
>
>
>
> ·         As part of this framework, what will be the limitations of fund
> allocation, factoring in that the funds need to be used in line with
> ICANN’s mission while at the same time recognizing the diversity of
> communities that ICANN serves? This should include recommendations on how
> to assess whether the proposed use is aligned with ICANN’s Mission.
> Furthermore consideration is expected to be given to what safeguards, if
> any, need to be in place.
>
>
>
> There should not be a limitation of fund allocations. However, you can use
> a series of tiers. FOr example:
>
>
>
> Tier 1: $X - $Y
>
> Tier 2: $Y+1 $#Z
>
>
>
> and so forth.
>
>
>
> For each tier there should be different requiuerements. These requirements
> should be more stringent as the $$ amount increases.
>
>
>
> Create a framework of interpretation around ICANN missions to help
> identify and guide if the money to be allocated is or is not in concordance
> with ICANN Mission. Such a framework is important to standarize the
> allocation process. A series of stress tests models should be created to
> validate the allocation
>
>
>
> For example, it will be a requierement that for a $1,000,000 allocation
> (the amount is just for illustration purposes only) the community has to be
> involved in the final decision.
>
>
>
> ·         What aspects should be considered to define a timeframe, if
> any, for the funds allocation mechanism to operate as well as the
> disbursements of funds? E.g. The timeframe for the operation of this new
> mechanism may provide the opportunity for long term support, or for funding
> to be released in tranches linked to milestone achievements, single or
> multiple disbursements.
>
>
>
> 1. Determine fund allocation: 90 days max.
>
> 2. Allocate 30% funds at approval time
>
> 3. Disburse 40$% of the allocation using specific milestones for the
> duration of the project
>
> 4. Disburse the last 30% at completion
>
>
>
> Use the aboe as a guideline and put a process in place to work with
> exceptions to the guideline.
>
>
>
> Please feel free to enter in contact for any questions, comments etc.
>
> Appreciate
>
>
>
>
>
> Estimados colegas
>
>
>
> El grupo de procedimientos trabajando para definir cómo deben ser
> utilizados los recursos financieros advenidos de las subastas de new gTLDs,
> y estamos trabajando en la construcción de esta moldura.
>
>
>
> • Como parte de este marco, ¿cuáles serán las limitaciones de la
> asignación de fondos, teniendo en cuenta que los fondos deben ser
> utilizados en consonancia con la misión de ICANN y al mismo tiempo
> reconocer la diversidad de comunidades que ICANN sirve? Esto debería
> incluir recomendaciones sobre cómo evaluar si el uso propuesto está
> alineado con la Misión de ICANN. Además, se espera que se preste atención a
> las medidas de salvaguardia que deben aplicarse, en su caso.
>
>
>
> • ¿Qué aspectos deberían considerarse para definir un calendario, si
> existe alguno, para que el mecanismo de asignación de fondos funcione, así
> como los desembolsos de fondos? P.ej. El calendario para el funcionamiento
> de este nuevo mecanismo puede brindar la oportunidad de un apoyo a largo
> plazo, o de que la financiación se libere en tramos relacionados con logros
> de hitos, desembolsos únicos o múltiples.
>
>
>
> Por favor siéntanse libres para hacer comentarios o preguntas.
>
> Agradezco su participación.
>
>
>
> *Vanda Scartezini*
>
> *Polo Consultores Associados*
>
> *Av. Paulista 1159, cj 1004*
>
> *01311-200- Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil*
>
> *Land Line: +55 11 3266.6253 <+55%2011%203266-6253>*
>
> *Mobile: + 55 11 98181.1464 <+55%2011%2098181-1464> *
>
> *Sorry for any typos. *
>
> *HAPPY 2017!*
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> At-Large mailing list
> At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
>
> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> At-Large mailing list
> At-Large at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large
>
> At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/at-large/attachments/20170512/59da4fdb/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 198545 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://atlarge-lists.icann.org/pipermail/at-large/attachments/20170512/59da4fdb/image001-0001.png>